Well, its about time! Chavez has been to easy on seditionists.
Imagine what this person would be saying if Bush or some republicans tried to have DemocraticUnderground shut down right now for sedition. They've said some pretty iffy things in the past about American troops, the war in Iraq, overthrowing the government here and so on. There is such a huge double standard for the posters there with Hugo Chavez and George Bush.
Yes, thank goodness for neocons. Neocon hawks are going all-out for Giuliani. They're just what the republican party really needs; more supporters of a pro-illegal alien, pro-abortion and anti-second amendment republican candidate for president of the United States.
Plenty of people on that thread posted to say I had no idea!
How many is that? One? Two? Do you honestly think your thread cost Ron Paul any real amount of votes?
spin it however you want
You're the only one spinning. What the hell is the "Oregon poll" anyway? A blogger account with a GMail e-mail address and about 400 page views before you posted it? Also, is this your idea of anything meaningful? How'd you find that nothing site anyways? Is it yours?
When you find some real proof, like at the least maybe a link to CNN or Fox News saying most of the hits to their internet polls came from stormfronters voting for Ron Paul, let me know.
Its been discovered that most of the Paul Qaeda internet spamming is being conducted from stormfrom.org, a neo-nazi site.
And who discovered this?
I swear one thread about something called the "Oregon poll" (a site with a frickin' GMail account for an e-mail address) having some stormfront nuts going to one website and suddenly that's the whole Ron Paul movement. Aside from that, do you have any proof whatsoever? And even if you did, who the hell cares? It's not as if Ron Paul has an active account himself over there or something.
Of course, you're not really interested in any of that. Anything that fits your imaginary belief of Paul-supporters must be true.
09/21/2007 4:13:35 PM PDT
· 10 of 17 NapkinUser
to A_Tradition_Continues; no dems; All
Of course it’s meaningless this early, so are the national early all-in-the-name polling data. John Kerry was at 4% in those same national polls in December 2003, and as we all know he won.