Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $15,331
18%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 18%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: 11thamendment

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Mexican Government Sues Walmart for El Paso Mass Shooting

    11/22/2019 1:17:25 PM PST · by Enlightened1 · 33 replies
    Breitbart ^ | 11/21/19 | ILDEFONSO ORTIZ and BRANDON DARBY
    The Mexican federal government announced the filing of a lawsuit in a U.S. court against Walmart for the August 3 mass shooting in El Paso, Texas. Mexico City claims the shopping center failed in providing necessary and reasonable security measures. A U.S. law firm hired by Mexico’s Consulate in El Paso filed the lawsuit on behalf of 10 Mexican nationals who were victims in the attack. On August 3, a lone gunman entered the Walmart near the Cielo Vista shopping center targeting what he called “Hispanic invaders” in a manifesto. The man killed 22 and injured 24 more. Texas prosecutors...
  • Russian metals tycoon Deripaska sues U.S. over sanctions

    03/15/2019 4:39:16 PM PDT · by NorseViking · 6 replies
    Yahoo Finance ^ | March 16, 2018 | Susan Heavey and Nathan Layne
    WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Russian tycoon Oleg Deripaska sued the United States on Friday, alleging that it had overstepped its legal bounds in imposing sanctions on him and made him the "latest victim" in the U.S. probe into Moscow's alleged election interference. In what legal experts called a long shot attempt, Deripaska asked a federal court in Washington to block the U.S. Treasury Department from using the "devastating power" of such sanctions, which he claims were arbitrarily applied to him last April and violated his right to due process under the U.S. Constitution. Deripaska, his lawsuit says, has been unfairly...
  • Huawei sues U.S., claiming security law banning its equipment is unconstitutional

    03/07/2019 10:26:08 AM PST · by SeekAndFind · 18 replies
    CBS News ^ | 03/07/2019
    Shenzhen, China - Chinese tech giant Huawei is challenging a U.S. law that labels the company a security risk and would limit its access to the American market for telecom equipment. Huawei Technologies' lawsuit, announced Thursday, asks a federal court to reject as unconstitutional a portion of this year's U.S. military appropriations act that bars the government and its contractors from using Huawei equipment. It comes as the biggest global maker of network gear fights a U.S. campaign to persuade allies to shun Huawei. That effort threatens to block access to major markets as phone carriers prepare to invest billions...
  • Their Rules: Claire McCaskill Seeks To Harm Indian Tribes

    10/12/2017 8:36:47 AM PDT · by Kaslin · 11 replies
    Townhall.com ^ | Ocrober 12, 2017 | Derek Hunter
    Monday was Columbus Day, or as liberals have taken to calling, “Indigenous People’s Day.” Democrats love sowing division, blaming Europeans for all of the world’s ills, and elevating the status of Native Americans. Well, they usually do. When it’s a choice between a long-dead Italian guy and American Indians, the choice is easy. When the choice is between their own reelection and anything, everything else loses to self-preservation.Such is the case with Missouri Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill.One of my first jobs in Washington was as a health policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation. While it may not sound exciting, it...
  • The 11th Amendment: Correcting the Supreme Court in action

    02/07/2015 5:25:48 AM PST · by cotton1706 · 28 replies
    news.yahoo.com ^ | 2/7/15 | NCC Staff
    The Constitution’s first amendment after the Bill of Rights represented the first use of congressional power to contradict a Supreme Court decision. The case of Chisholm v. Georgia in 1793 was the first significant decision handed down by the Court, and it was so controversial that lawmakers moved quickly to nullify its findings. The controversy had its roots in the Revolutionary War. In 1777, the Executive Council of Georgia authorized the purchase of needed supplies from a South Carolina businessman. After receiving the supplies, Georgia didn’t pay as promised. After the merchant’s death, the executor of his estate, Alexander Chisholm,...
  • How did the “Progressives” Empower Themselves at our Expense for Over 140 Years?

    06/28/2014 10:13:14 AM PDT · by Oldpuppymax · 30 replies
    Coach is Right ^ | 6/28/14 | Jerry Todd
    A three-legged stool can always stand without wobbling – a solid foundation for good or evil. Addressing the 14th, 16th and 17th Amendments. The Articles (7) and their clauses, the Bill of Rights (Amendments 1-10) are original to the Founders, Framers, and Ratifiers. The 11th and 12th Amendments serve to States’ protection. The 13th freed the slaves. The 14th Amendment – This was the first of three Amendments that created the “progressive” three legged stool. The 14th was a mandatory ratification, a required condition before states were allowed reunification after the Civil War. Congress deliberately established federal supremacy. The 14th,...
  • Mexico urges US court to block part of Arizona law

    12/28/2012 3:58:44 PM PST · by AuntB · 15 replies
    Rightmarch ^ | Dec. 28, 2012 | Rightmarch
    Jacques Belleaud at MyFoxDC reports: The Mexican government has urged a U.S. court to stop Arizona from enforcing a minor section of the state’s 2010 immigration law that prohibits the harboring of illegal immigrants. Lawyers representing Mexico asked the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a filing Wednesday to uphold a lower-court ruling that blocked police from enforcing the ban. Mexico argued the ban harms diplomatic relations between the United States, undermines the U.S.’s ability to speak to a foreign country with one voice and encourages the marginalization of Mexicans and people who appear to be from Latin America. “Mexico...
  • Obama jobs bill abolishes 11th Amendment

    11/12/2011 12:53:46 PM PST · by eglman · 14 replies
    TheNewAmerican ^ | 10 November 2011 | Joe Wolverton
    As with the constitutional struggle that was stirred up by the passage of ObamaCare, the President’s latest pet proposal is brightening the battle lines between friends of federal power and those who advocate the protection of the sovereignty of states. The American Jobs Act contains several key provisions that apparently push the boundary between state and federal power back, expanding Washington’s sphere of authority.
  • the 11th Amendment

    04/25/2009 7:30:42 AM PDT · by SunkenCiv · 6 replies · 690+ views
    Constitution of the United States, via FindLaw et al ^ | passed by the Congress on March 4, 1794 and was ratified on February 7, 1795 | The Framers et al
    The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
  • Private tollway?

    04/08/2008 10:07:25 AM PDT · by Tolerance Sucks Rocks · 27 replies · 252+ views
    The Midwest City Sun ^ | April 7, 2008 | Eric Bradshaw
    Several Oklahoma legislators are concerned that individuals and organizations are quietly working on plans to create a privately-operated tollway in Oklahoma. Many referred to Spain-based Cintra, which has been involved in the development of a proposed Trans-Texas Corridor. Cintra also took over the operation of the Indiana East-West Toll Road from the Indiana Department of Transportation in 2006. Oklahoma State Sen. Randy Brogdon and state representatives Eric Proctor, Richard Morrisette, Scott Inman and Charles Key all expressed concern that efforts to open up Oklahoma to a privately operated tollway system were being kept out of the view of the general...
  • Justice reverses himself on rights

    06/01/2003 11:31:11 PM PDT · by JohnHuang2 · 2 replies · 72+ views
    Washington Times ^ | Monday, June 2, 2003 | By Frank J. Murray
    <p>Justice Stephen G. Breyer shifted this week from outspoken dissenter to majority voter on a key federalism and states' rights issue, but the Supreme Court's most junior justice has not switched sides.</p> <p>One year after vowing to fight expansion of 11th Amendment immunity, Justice Breyer found himself instead in the majority of a 6-3 ruling going the other way to pierce the states' constitutional immunity from private lawsuits.</p>