Free Republic

Hi, Maggie! :)

Your discovery was posted on cryingwolfe.wordpress.com. That's a blog created by Mike Stack. He was also a victim of Neal Rauhauser when Anthony Weiner first denied his pecker pictures and said he was hacked. Rauhauser accused Mike Stack of hacking Weiner's account and slipping the pecker pics in. It came out that was a lie and Mike was asleep when the scandal hit and definitely wasn't the one to announce anything about Anthony Weiner's sexcapades. So, another victim to add to the pile of Rauhauser's mayhem.

Mike said he was SWATTED at gun-point along with his parents at their home and the couple who lived at his previous residence. The false call that was placed to the police said that Mike just killed his wife. That blog is what Mike created to clear his name from the lies that Rauhauser spread about him. In the course of that, I read them discussing that maggief from FR discovered the first clues about this weirdo. That find you made linked him right to the alias that made the threat against Dick Cheney.

I just googled and got where you are mentioned - http://cryingwolfe.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/neal-rauhauser-threatens-dick-cheney-2/

That's the story and if you scroll down to the comments, you'll see where they credited you for finding that. Basically, no one knew who Iowaboy was. Then Neal Rauhauser cross-posted without logging out of one of his accounts and you busted his alias as being him.

Here's your old comment on FR - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2603935/posts#22

Right, no one knows where he lives. He says that he does that intentionally so no one can catch him. Nothing in his name, no car, no driver's license (or so he says).

I started following it when it first started and maggief from FreeRepublic caught him using the alias Iowaboy. So he was here playing his games first and admitted it on the Daily Kos, where he used to write before he was banned. He moved from stalking Freepers to Twitter and that's when he started making lists and putting conservatives on them with their personal photos that he stole, calling them "terrorists". He tried to intimidate them by bragging about all his government affiliations. He even had Ted Nugent on the list!

He made use of a thing called "TeaPartyTracker" which also tried to intimidate people and was there to collect "hate-speech". Then the conservatives started using that #hashtag to send THEIR hate-speech and boy was that hate-speech. I think most of it is in this photo album Conservative Online collected. http://conservativereport.org/neal-ruahauser-progessive-pst-uses-violence-death-threats-racism/ - that collection is from one of the first articles written in October, 2010. I think I linked it but here it is again - http://conservativereport.org/neal-ruahauser-progessive-pst-uses-violence-death-threats-racism/

Rauhauser went into Twitter to menace them wearing this mask to hide his identity. He called himself Wingnutwatch. So they went out and found who it really was and when they did, they found out he was running a political campaign business called Progressive PST that democratic candidates had hired to help them win elections through social-media. Well, as you can imagine, the conservatives had a fit! Isn't this illegal?

But you know what? The strange thing I don't see is that Progressive PST was absorbed into ProgressiveCongress.org and ProgressiveCongress.com. Neal Rauhauser admits he set that up and it still exists! He boasted getting grants, one was for the sum of $400,000 and I saw an FEC report that said one year they made almost $1,000,000! So there's money going on here too.

I haven't gotten that far yet, so I shouldn't say too much, but something really dirty is going on.

If anyone knows how to find out how to track funds from 501(3)(c)'s, I'm not too good at that. I know the names on those accounts are Darcy Burner and Charles Chamberlin and they maintain an address on Pennsylvania Ave in Washington, D.C.

What I did here was try to catch people up on what happened from the start, what happened after and how it escalated into this heart-wrenching horror for these victims that doesn't seem to ever stop and only gets worse. I just can't imagine having my little daughter being pinned as the obsession of a psycho with this type of history, but I've seen the evidence and I'm disgusted that the FBI put their own egos before the safety of the public because they were embarrassed this man slipped through their cracks.

I've sent a couple emails to some old contacts to see if the police will release a statement about this since their jurisdiction is handling the latest investigation. That would be very helpful. I'll let you know anything I can find out or try to answer anything I can.

I know part of that forum that I linked the excerpt from is private. Apparently they have all the evidence inside that thing in a private area. A good trusted journalist should go take a look! If the public area is any indication, the private area is probably much worse.

I remember when it was FREE REPUBLIC who found Neal Rauhauser right HERE posing as different aliases! He even admitted he was pretending to be a conservative to "get in our network". He must love playing spy games or something.

But he made a big mistake as IOWABOY when he was using that account somewhere, I forget. It's on those forums I linked. He cross-posted thinking he was on another alias but was still logged into IOWABOY. He threatened to "pop a cap into Dick Cheney". It was a member from FreeRepublic that spotted it.

That was years ago, but recently they found him trying to get someone to do a swat on Rep. Nass from Wisconsin. There's an email to prove it. A SWAT is a life-threatening situation where someone makes a fake call to a police agency and tells them that someone is being murdered so they come blazing in with guns and SWAT suits. That's already happened to quite a few people. This guy's name is all over every incident. He either wrote negatively about, previously threatened or knew every victim.

I understand that there's a lot of material, but this has been going on with nothing done for over 3 years now, so much has accumulated.

Yes, it's going on right now. This Rauhauser guy went after a former cop because he HEARD he spoke to Andrew Breitbart ONCE. Actually, he thinks the girl who found out it was him stalking her 3 years ago knew the former cop, so he went after him to get to her with false allegations and started all kinds of investigations.

No one knows where he is. He laughs that they can't catch him, but the question is, are they even looking? If not, why not? In the meantime, this PIG wrote a blog (it's down now but was up for months) describing one of the victim's daughter's breasts and put her picture up. I understand she was 12 at the time. Then he went hunting for the little girl, calling her school and pretending to be a relative. Then he posted a picture of the door to her home.

I understand the victims have been to the FBI, the police and all over and no one has done a damn thing.

He hooked up with Brett Kimberlin who is doing the R.I.C.O. case against Malkin, Beck, etc., but Rauhauser is the one who is now threatening these long-standing victims that he's going to drag them into it and steal their assets.

I can't understand why he's not in jail myself, so I'm doing my part and letting the public know so whoever covered this up feels the shame they should.

I also listened to the phone recordings between Tom Ryan and Chet Uber that were leaked onto the Internet, deleted but archived by the Way Back Machine. It takes hours to go through them but the crimes being committed in just that alone, insult the senses. I believe it was Part-2 that was the most incredible. Absolutely incredible this has escaped the main stream media.

Since there are so many reference links in that piece, I'll add it alone here if anyone is interested.

http://zandali.forumotion.com/t501-chet-uber-talks-to-tom-ryan-about-neal-rauhauser-infragard-and-project-vigilant

Thank you so much, WashingtonSource! I've been following this story for years now and when I saw this recent development, I just had to do something so I thought writing it up summarily here may help. It literally took me weeks! And God love them, I see some former Marines are helping them.

I know a Steve from that circle who was studying law back when but I'm not sure that's the same guy I see on that board. I hope they sue their brains out for millions after putting this CREEP behind bars!

Photo: Screenshot Rauhauser YouTube

FLASHBACK to 2010 just before the mid-terms, a scandal involving the use of Twitter to target conservatives and put them on a watch list where they were threatened with planned, frivolous lawsuits simply for signing up for a social-media account, with the intent to harass them, their jobs and family, has escalated at an alarming rate to include the abuse of at least 4 police departments, 2 FBI agencies, a Prosecutor's Office, children and an entire City Council.

Subsequent to the events following Twittergate in 2010, Weinergate in 2011 and Swattergate in 2011-2013, political activist, Neal Rauhauser, bedded down with ex-convict and Speedway Bomber, Brett Kimberlin and admittedly assisted him in concocting an elaborate lawsuit under federal R.I.C.O. statutes, naming Michelle Malkin, Glen Beck, Erick Erickson, James O’Keefe and others, claiming they are part of a “criminal racketeering enterprise”.

While many of the defendants named are Internet News sources, Neal Rauhauser has used the federal lawsuit event to revisit old grudges against citizens that he hasn't been able to destroy to his satisfaction from 2010.

This time, he lodged false allegations against a police department in N.J., allegedly claiming they were using government databases to spy on him and filtering the results to a detective agency in that locale. While he's aware his claims are false, what he is really seeking is the identity of the one person he wasn't able to find in 2010 that researched his illegal activities surrounding political campaigns.

Within this relentless pursuit, he has stalked families, endangered children, businesses and abused local and federal resources with mind-boggling conspiracy theories that are duplicitously false and malicious. Some of these works include: "Breitbart-ISR-Cell", "Team Themis", "Spook Country" and "Kookpocalypse". These fictitious conspiracies are disseminated with the unrestricted use of Twitter and WordPress, despite being against their Terms of Service and in violation of the law. *Neal Rauhauser claims to have developer status with Twitter and the source of this report claims to have evidence that a WordPress employee or volunteer, "Raincoaster", has actually mirrored his blogs.

Recently, the ex-wife of Neal Rauhauser has revealed that he has been clinically diagnosed as a Sociopath with Narcissistic Personality Disorder complicated with the psychiatric condition known as Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD). She also claims child-support arrears in excess of $47,000.00 and that he has a prior felony for Possession of Nuclear Materials. Due to recent threats received by her ex-husband, she states that she has had to hire private security in addition to notifying the local authorities.

Neal Rauhauser has gone from a pre-meditated plan in 2010 to intimidate the right-wing from exploring social-media while manipulating it himself to affect the outcome of elections, to brazen death threats - all while having warrants out for his arrest and yet, being able to conceal his whereabouts while demanding attention for his continued false reports to law enforcement agencies.

Having followed this story since 2010, I am aghast to learn that law enforcement not only hasn't arrested Neal Rauhauser, they used him as an informant for the Washington, D.C. FBI investigations concerning Anonymous. He is/was a member of the FBI-coordinated organization known as Infragard and boasts a full continuum of federal contacts at his disposal. He was a member of the controversial Project Vigilant with long-time friend, Chet Uber where former DoJ Cyber-Crimes Unit, Mark Rasch, Esq., is counsel of record. Some disturbing recordings after Mr. Uber became estranged from Rauhauser are archived and speak about his plans to "overthrow the United States government".

A disturbing Manifesto allegedly written by Neal Rauhauser was also found on the Deep Web containing alarming calls for an anarchist uprising and destruction of the United States of America.

Please contact your local representative and ask that this man be investigated and brought to justice once and for all! The next random victim could easily be you or a loved one.

While the National Bloggers Club is seeking donations to fight their battle with Brett Kimberlin and their right to blog, no one is focused on the victims of these continuing crimes who do not ask for your money. I believe they deserve some support. Please call your representative and speak out. Ask them to pressure the FBI to enforce the law regardless of the fallout it means for corruption being exposed, which is why I believe these victims are being ignored.

"This means Moulitsas has known all along that both candidates had issues regarding their qualifications as natural-born citizens and that this could be a problem."

He not only knew they had problems, this evidence proves Moulitsas was the first to put the BC on the internet. Where did he get it from? Who gave it to him since only a family member is allowed to get it per the Hawaii Health Department? There's so many questions here about this Moulitsas person.

It seems these questions and more are asked in the first BC appearance that Moulitsas posts and they laugh at him. Then days later, FactCheck.org mysteriously finds it and adds a few conjured answers to the original doubts and laughter at Moulitsas, trying to make it appear as a more credible story and source. It makes sense they had to fix it. They're all laughing at the "trimmed BC" that Moulitsas is waving around, so they plug up a few holes and ship the BC over to FactCheck.org.

Then, while everyone is scrambling around trying to find clues with FactCheck.org, they should have been questioning Moulitsas since he's really the snake on puppet strings here.

All I can say is wow, Erica! The media didn't hone in on this. The lawyers didn't pick up on it. You're one of the few blogs that is starting to put 2+2 together. The duping of the American public runs really deep!

Really good to see you and Steve doing work on this together.

Whoever has blogged this should probably change the URL to the revised one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgAYo_0EeJY

This new URL has no sound. Gee, I wonder what happened to that considering no one is supposed to be uploading news derivations either or movie bytes, yet I see that all the time, especially from the left.

The left doesn't want you to see it. That's the problem there.

We should take the time to point out these double-standards and report their uploads, especially the left who continuously uploads FOX news videos to You Tube just to whine about FOX.

Well, I just went to the video and it says this:

Inbox:: There is no connection to this video and Greg Howard or Patrick Read, except to the extent that a partially-done report was given to them confidentially while we were working on this to see if they had anything to add and they did not. We spoke to numerous people.

The material was then handed over to Andrew Breitbart after this was uploaded.

The rumor that this video was created by either individual is false. They blogged it as did many others. I hope that settles the Inbox inquiries.

Then I go look up GregWHoward and SwiftRead and they are trashing Andrew Breitbart, Dick Army, Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck. That's from last night's tweets.

If you go back far enough, you see that Greg Howard seemed perturbed that Andrew Breitbart hadn't taken notice of him and the problems he was having before WingnutWatch arrived on the scene. Apparently when the video hit, Mr. Howard was upset that no one paid him first notice of his personal confrontation with the "beandogs" and that others only sent it to the media after the Tea Party Tracker scam came to light.

The same thing holds for Patrick Read, who appears to be in a non-Tea Party group with Greg Howard looking for attention to their personal issues.

I would be very careful here for the sake of the Tea Party. The posts I read from Greg Howard and cheering on by Patrick Read would indicate they are leading people to believe they did this video and by extension, want people to believe that the mentioned celebrities above are trying to make money off of the Tea Party and should be shunned.

It would also appear that only Andrew Breitbart (that I can tell) was contacted by the group who did the report and the video.

Be very wary of this, folks. I don't like where this might be going. Greg Howard is obviously not friendly to the media or certain conservatives. His twitter page is filled with elitism and his objective appears that he wants to be the next "Rush Limbaugh".

He seems delusional and very full of himself. The Other McCain and Gawker should have read this stuff before putting those two front and center. I don't like it. The named celebrities have always been Tea Party friendly. To read posts to the contrary, with malice, should have been the responsible thing to check first before coming here to make fun of the efforts of the video, obviously made by someone else, and plug for his friends who seem suspect to me.

Here are some of the posts I found tonight -

From Greg Howard's Twitter page:

@FreeWeThePeople Now I'm hearing I harassed AB. I don't think I'm going to waste much more time here other than on the news.

@FreeWeThePeople Now I'm clearing out some AB fans. Seems the celebrities are above reproach, but we're not. LOL

@FreeWeThePeople Last year I got rid of all my O'Reilly butt kisser followers. Last fall I cleaned out a few Beckistas in reply to FreeWeThePeople

@FreeWeThePeople The groupies of that hanger on guy are now coming at me in droves. Gee, so many sacred cows that #tcot worships

@SwiftRead Gosh, don't want a glory hog like me to give the wrong impression. Maybe I should change it. LOL

And it goes on and on and on. This stink, folks! BEWARE of those who boast and disparage others for the sake of drawing attention to themselves.

http://twitter.com/gregwhoward

" Born in the U.S.? You're a U.S. citizen. Period. "

That's a lie. Period.

http://undeadrevolution.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen/#comment-93

I can't say I buy Pryor's logic. The Congress makes the laws but it's the Supreme Court who interprets whether that law is constitutionally sound.

Since the Supreme Court has never emphatically given an opinion as to the intent of the Framers with regard to A2 and has never entertained a case asking for one, the question is still on the table. Obama is not the first candidate who was ever questioned and this comes even after legislation because the door on the interpretation against the Constitution hasn't been shut by the Supreme Court. The Fourteenth Amendment doesn't do it and Wong Kim Ark doesn't do it.

While Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly would love to paint everyone into the looney fringe corner, I think it says a lot when a person such as Sarah Palin refuses to allow them to judge her into the padded room they were looking to do.

The eligibility issue is a constitutional one and she knows it. It's Beck and O'Reilly, whom while claiming to love that Constitution so much, are the ones who are dissing it by categorizing ANYONE as a lunatic who wants simple answers.

I personally wouldn't have adopted this label of "birther" that the media used as a definition for those who emphatically don't believe Obama was born here because it's not a proven fact. This "birther" organization did just that and now they have to live with the consequences of agreeing with the media label. It was a stupid idea on that TeoBear's part and an even stupider idea on Apuzzo/Kerchner's part to advertise for him.

I'm not a "birther". I'm definitely not a "9/11 Truther". But I'm certainly smart enough to know that something is going on with the non-answers of eligibility that the Senate started back in February, 2008 and attempted to squash before it got out of hand. Well, now it's out of hand but it's CONGRESS' fault, not the people's fault.

That's a problem of facts that you will never hear on Glenn Beck or Bill O'Reilly's show.

There's a similar thread where we talked about this same thing on FP here: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2335055/posts - See last comments if you don't want to read the whole thing.

LOL. And he’s a DEACON!

LOL!

Fascinating! Who would have known? Not me.

Out of curiosity, I went and read not the RedState website, but the actual posts made on Twitter by Erick Erickson who wrote this article.

This is a professional of any kind? Who the hell talks like this and can be expected to be taken seriously?

http://twitter.com/ewerickson

He tweets, "In Washington, when people call you a "fiscal conservative" they simply mean you are for abortion and gay marriage."

Huh??? What does either have to do with fiscal conservatism?

Then there's, "I am so totally gonna have to take a real suitcase and check a bag for CPAC. A full week away from home."

Please stay home, Mr. Valley Man

And the clueless among the equally clueless, "It's not that birfers are racist. It's that they just don't think Hawaiians should be eligible for the Presidency."

And now we know why this guy couldn't argue Wong Kim Ark on the best day of his life. Just one, ONE quote from Henry C. Ide in the 1800's was more informative to explaining that case than anything that comes close to the so-called intellectuals of today.

It's a sad, ignorant and shameful comparison, not to mention a true reflection on today's poor education system.

In my opinion, the RINOs in Congress were also guilty of pushing legislation to change Article II. We saw it again in 2008 with S. 2678 and S.R. 511 when this came out:

http://zapem.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/obama-knew-he-wasnt-eligible-for-potus/

And it's because of that guilt they stay mum about Obama's legitimacy and continue to say nothing. But all the proof shows that Congress started this problem. The people pick up on it and question what's going on and immediately they are attacked with hardly any true Republican or even a constitution-loving Democrat to defend them. And why? Because they'd have to admit their own guilt and hand in this thing and they won't.

That's what is really going on here and the reason why MOST of them need to be voted out in November and in 2012. Because they're mostly all corrupt.

These jokers like Erickson are having a field day at the people's expense for a problem that originated in Congress and now they have the audacity to tell these people that if they dare question anything, they aren't welcome in their little cliques.

I think it's in what Starwise reposted?

"And this is just the beginning of my decimation of these ignorant, intimidated, scared rabbits who seem to be afraid of crazy name-calling that has no basis in fact, and thereby, throw out the law for fear of being ostracized"

He's calling out those who are running scared from the Chicago-thug labels that Obama used to defend himself in this entire affair. He's making the clear distinction between the historical facts and the rumor of the day that "has no basis in fact".

Basically, he's saying that Eric Erickson is a dumbass who didn't do his homework and is intimidated by the Chicago-thug labels because he doesn't want to be labeled as a "birther" who assumes that if Obama just proves he was born in Hawaii, that's good enough for the framers of A2.

He makes the distinction between a "birther" as defined by MSNBC, those who don't believe Obama was born here, with the history of the Constitution itself. He says it's not "one and the same".

Then he picks out a distinct quote from a writing made by Ide in response to Collins who was the attorney in the Wong Kim Ark case that appeared on Leo Donofrio's blog back when UR was feeding him the hidden proof we can't find on the internet because that proof is mysteriously missing.

I know Donofrio put up a few pieces by Collins but does anyone remember if he put up the entire one by Ide? I don't think I copied that one and Donofrio took down the stuff they gave him right after Undead Revolution stopped talking.

One thing is clear. Erickson is playing politics and doesn't know enough about history to stand up to a "birther" label and call out the truth for what it is. One (birthers) is a hypothetical and the other (the constitutional history) is fact. UR finds the documentation of the actual history behind Wong Kim Ark and throws a piece of it in his face.

I doubt Erickson would respond. None of them ever respond to the constitutional side of this. They don't know how! How this guy Erickson ever confused Wong Kim Ark with those that think Obama wasn't born in Hawaii is anyone's guess. But he seems to have declared war on all of them by banning anyone who doesn't see it his way. Go 1st Amendment! :/

Sorry, I forgot to include the Red State article

http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/02/14/my-final-thought-on-the-birther-issue/

UR's reply to it is in the comment section of UR's blog way down at the bottom by "Steve".

http://undeadrevolution.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen/

He makes a good point that throwing the baby out with the dirty bath water is not a wise thing to be doing.

He also doesn't seem to be enamored with the troopers out there right now, of either opinion, more or less due to the extreme of the approaches maybe? So far, I've only seen them praise the work of Donofrio and today, Mark Levin! That's odd because Donofrio seemed to be much more accomodating to Obama than Mark Levin did from the start. They would seem to be strange bedfellows, but UR seems to look deeper than anyone has so far historically, so it doesn't surprise me that they are obviously listening to other respected personalities. They quote Mark Levin and even Bill Clinton quite off the cuff, as if they have it memorized. Putting the two of them in one reply is as about as bi-partisan as it gets and shows they are gathering their research from everywhere.

Looks like one of them just ripped apart Red State's article that's going around Twitter right now. I saw that and went to this blog to check something and sure enough, they were already on it.

I can understand why they haven't submitted all their research at this point in time, but I'd love to see all this history that suspiciously isn't even found on the internet and is still collecting dust in college libraries the American public is refused access to. That alone burns me up. You have to pay college fees now just to have access to our own true history! But if you notice, the internet is loaded with untrue history by the left. That, they have no problem with shoving down our throats.

Anyway, they posted another piece of historical evidence from the 1800's that seems to be a much different take on the roots of citizenship.

There are also some updated comments which show that they haven't left the blog. They seem to be taking instruction per their mentors and putting out only what they suggest right now. Considering the money Obama is investing in this, maybe there is something to their strategy.

I refuse to accept that all this work was so that we could see another 3rd party candidate. It's going to really PISS me off if I do see it, too. I won't support it.

I agree with Mark Levin. A 3rd party vote is nothing more than one that cancels out MY vote and puts asses like Obama in office.

And if you need a quote to find where the constitutional debates read from Locke, Rousseau, Vattel and others, you’re pathetic. Here you sit on your perch acting like a lawyer and you don’t even know the fundamentals of what took place during the construction of the constitution. That takes nerve to ask me where to find it. You’re laughable, Non-Sequitur and you’re no lawyer, you’re just an arm chair blowhorn.

Obviously you did not. Otherwise you wouldn't be making such asinine statements.

Obvioulsy you're mad because history is coming back to bite you and you don't like it. Too bad. Deal with it. By the time this country is done revisting that case, its law review, and the rest of what the framers had to say, you're not going to like the "change" that is coming.

I'm glad this happened. It's been far too long your ilk has crapped all over the Constitution. I'm sure guys like Glenn Beck are your worst nightmare too, along with the Tea Parties, the socialized medicine protests and everything else that is ready to explode around here.

I hope they reinstitute forcing you to take an oath or find another place to live. I'd be all for that. Go find another nation to destroy. There's nothing about you that remotely compares with even the liberalist man that sat in the constitutional convention. You're that evil.

You liberals are done. Everyone hates you and democrat is now synonymous with socialist. Get used to your new label. You deserve all the fallout you're getting.