Free Republic

"DU designation for qualifying a poster, AND the fact that he has used NO logic or reason on this entire thread, and is a recent sign-on, I don't think there's much doubt that he's just trolling from the left.

You are so wrong about all of this, it is infuriating. I will refrain from telling you what I think you do all day and what you are all about. And what does 'DU designation' mean? I really don't know what that means. Seriously I ask for an exdplanation on that one if you would be so kind. and 'No Logic or reason on entire thread'? This, coming from you? What a cpmplete load of crap.

But, Hey God bless you and your opinions. We all have them. They're a dime a dozen. You seem to be the master here, how did you arrive at such a prestigious position? Self-appointment? Do you need it that badly?

If you're up for it let's e-mail off of here, because you are so completely off base about me and I want to know why. I would like to know what makes you so judgemental about me since you can't possibly know a thing about me.

To: InsureAmerica:
I have to say I am still trying to understand how your initial comment resulted in almost everybody on this thread hating you. Was there some sort of insidious intent in your comment that I'm just too stupid to get?
163 posted on 02/09/2006

---

And now to starcmc and the psuedo-intellectual ohiowfan.

And The Russian comments which I happened to have read after spending time writing the following but have not commented on here can be addressed as requested. As always, amazing if someone doesn't know about it, they still feel they are an expert when it comes time to make a comment. For those of you who've made the stupid comments that my english doesn't sound proper to obviously try to facilitate some agenda, you must think that word order is exactly the same in every language. What a wonderful thing to know.

From my bud Star:
"If I believed THAT then I would be an idiot"

See, here we have a case of someone (you) who has a need to be, or at least a need to pretend to be someone of great importance. This is all relative of course, (importance, that is), and subjective of course, but I can think of no other reason why you would write as you do and continue to attack me as if I am someone you deeply despise fro some reason. Well, one reason actually that I can think of for this - you are a blowhard with a large ego and cannot stand to not be a legend in your own mind. If you are such a man such a great person, then I present to you a challenge. A real man would not ignore the challenge, yes? especially when it is reasonable by any measure. Can we agree on this? You will respond?

So, here it is: You have asserted upon several occasions that I have mentioned Rosa Parks (latest example - 'I can't believe that you still say you didn't mention Rosa Parks')

Once again, (as you have yet failed to show me so far when I asked you to) I want you to show me where I mentioned rosa parks. You can't do it because it didn't happen.

So, rather than address that fact, what will most certainly happen is that you instead will completely ignore it, and will come up with some additional nonsense. The reason is that anything you write here must consider YOU first and foremost, without regard to objectivity, opposing points of view, or anything that you are not aware of. (ie, if I don't know about it, it doesn;t exist) Unless your ego is satisfied, you will not be able to sleep soundly at night and you will walk around every day, go through life with a grudge, with an attitude, with a problem unless and only if you are able to have satisfied yourself that you have 'bested' me. If you can, within the continuous dialogue that we all have in our minds, tell yourself that you are 'the best', then and only then can you move on to your next conquest.

Grammar and spelling sub par, is another of your accusations. First of all, what does it matter? Am I writing a thesis here, or is this a forum for political dicussion? (It matters because it is an example of how you use ad hominum attacks and fallacies of logic to spout your nonsense.) This is always a trademark fallback position when all else fails. So for you, you need to cast upon me the 'grammar is sub-par' position because you don't have too much else to argue.

Let me know when you want to test this, this sub-par grammar. I am tempted here to defend myself on this topic, but will not. Maybe we can just leave it at this: what special qualifications do you personally hold that would make your accusation about grammar, etc., worth seriousw consideration by anyone??
As to who between the two of us is better read and has superior grammar skills, I will challenge you on this any time, day place. AGAIN, regarding your response to this, I would fully expect your typical approach, a diversionary action of some type to avoid the issue and still maintain your sense of superiority and purpose here.

Regarding this thread, I spent almost the whole time responding mainly to accusations about my character (and when this is necessary there usually is very little opportunity for mature relevent debate) with 99% of them (accusations) uneccessary. I would imagine if only the accusers, followers of the herd, and those of your ilk would have taken more than 6 seconds to read what I have written there would be no need for such ridiculous statements such as your recent "You spent an entire thread being a jerk and NOW you want to say it's satire??" You fall into this category, no interest in issues, lots of interest in satisfying the need to be important in your own mind. Regarding satire, I mentioned it to you because it most definitely became clear to me that you actually think that I think CS King was an integral part of the movement because she refused to move from her bus seat. I gave you the opportunity at that point to refute or at least respond to this, which again, using your m.o., you have ignored, and the whole thing then, as regards you has become laughable. You really think I was serious when I suggested CS King 'rode the bus', that is all. You cannot be man enough to say that perhaps you misunderstood what I wrote. And 'NOW', as you say,(your post here which I respond to) is not the only time I have said it is satire. This is further evidence that you only want to bash people (or at least me) rather than have a mature argument, because it tells me you didn't read everything I wrote, only what you wanted to read to suit you position to bash me.

And finally, from your post which I now am responding to, I quote you,
"I can't believe that you still say you didn't mention Rosa Parks! Thanks for the laugh."

It's not rocket science. I asked you to show me where I said this in at least one other message to you here, and you have not. So, again, where did I mention Rosa Parks?

I predict you will either disappear so as not to have to respond, or you will respond as is your typical style, use ad hominum diversionary bull**t to evade the issue.

So we have our action plan. My Spelling and grammar vs yours, and Rosa parks being mentioned by me somewhere that you have yet to indicate.
What kind of values will you demonstrate now, in order to discuss or respond to me about these?

You are either worthy of this, in which case I would gladly take the opportunity to make a new acquaintance, or you are a total moron. Which is it?

And since the norm seems to try to embarrass me and then make sure everyone knows about it, I have taken the liberty of including all involved in this wonderful discourse today. My favorite was OHIOWFAN, someone who knows how to flap a yap, make all kinds of accusations about anyone for any reason, but probably just doesn’t know a whole lot about a whole lot.


Hear hear, to being a freethinker rather than a freethinker wannabee.

It was satire, you idiot!!!! Can you seriously tell me you really thought that I thought coretta scott king sat in the front of a bus? I absolutely don't believe anyone is even remotely stupid ehougthht to think that. I NEVER MENTIONED ROSA PARKS. You are all victims of the heard mentality. one starts, then another jumps in, and before you know it 'the troops' are called in (shiver shiver). If indeed, Star, that is what you thought, and you really didn't get it, then I won't hold it against you. I just can't believe big old bad you would seriously think that I think king sat in the front of a bus......holey mackerel...

not freeper opinions. You misunderstand. YOUR opinion is the one I was referring to. Nice try.

Show me where. Come on. Your move now. Come on. I'll wait for it. Or do you just want to get your worthless 2 cents in? Sounds like it to me.

well at least I'm not registered there like you, sheesh.....

until later, Poka, Da Skorova, Vsevo dobrova, Da Zvedanya

(byebye)

Means absolutely nothing coming from someone I don't know, other than by the inane follow the crowd writings you've posted. But hey, no problem. You can think what you want.

I know i am strange, and by the way pal, lets put something to rest. I am grown up, ok? Take that one off of your list cause it's really getting old and boring.

oh actually I do get it. The fun is watching you accuse me of 'not getting it'. It is precious.

It's like the old trick, pulling a quarter out from behind a child's ear. Makes me wonder if YOU get it....

see, your the classic example here. Gotta win every argument, if not, then your way out is to call people names., 4-5 instances in your last post alone.

It's really wacko, let me tell you.

maybe so, but it ain't true.

"I have to say I am still trying to understand how your initial comment resulted in almost everybody on this thread hating you. Was there some sort of insidious intent in your comment that I'm just too stupid to get?"

I'm with you 100% brother. I don't get it at all, other than what I wrote about people being more interested in flaunting their egos and coming out on top with every issue presented here, taking their normal daily life's frustrations out here, etc. It is very odd, indeed. The way it works is a gang forms, one or two start, then others with absolutely nothing to add join in, because its the easiest thing to do, to be part of the crowd.

I never mentioned rosa parks. end of story. inference, yes, if you wish. And I do not mind someone threatening to egg my house (of course I know you're jnot serious), what i do mind is someone attacking me in an ad hominum fashion, knowing not the slightest thing about me, even if it is as mundane as 'throwing eggs'.

Thats all

"This boy is sometimes amusing and sometimes quite frightening, isn't he?"

Do you realize, this is exactly how I wish to be? I really mean it. I am not one to lead a boring, part of the herd kind of life. It is heartening that you wrote this.

Thanks!

sorry to hear that, you are in my thoughts. Maybe some herbal supplements would help?

sorry to hear that, you are in my thoughts. Maybe some hnerbal supplements would help?

I have never been banned from any forum either here or elsewhere.

(Well, there was that one occurance on a site about how to obtain travel visas about 5 years ago but that doesn't count and I was put back on after the admin understood whast happened.).

Why do you ask, Coop, I wonder? What indication do you have that I have been banned?

understood. Lets use your logic, because you have said plently about me which is completely untrue. So, where does it get us? That's my point. What do you want me to prove to you? You base your assessment of my character ONLY on what you have read here, nothing else. I do not for a second doubt anything about you, just turned it around so you can see the other side.

yes, absolutely by inference, but it was (as much as I hate to use the word) satire, given the totality of the whole thing.