Free Republic

Does anyone know the difference between Truth and truthers?

The "security firm" is called American Police Force which is really Blackwater as admitted on APF's website which continues to be not available, then available again.

Other URLS:

http://www.americanpolicegroup.com

http://www.billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_023e1c90-ae1b-11de-8891-001cc4c03286.html

http://www.infowars.com/exposed-american-police-force-is-a-blackwater-front-group/

“Merry Christmas and Off With Your Head”
http://www.public-action.com/christmas.html

Home is where the priest has his back to the people and isn’t any alphabet soup sect such as the NO, SSPX, SSPV, CMRI, FSSP; nor does it pay allegiance to 5 bogus men who’ve usurped the papacy since Pope Pius XII was assassinated in 1958; nor does it pay allegiance to the Antichrist’s Vatican “II” council.

But, this is how it will be done as has happened in other countries taken over by commie mercs.

Looks more like the bolshevik revolution every day. Rand - socialist

Oh, they must replace the ones they bombed.

Cheers for OK!

Great star is Lucifer falling from heaven then spreading his evil on earth.

This movie is as a magician saying to the audience, “Look there (thinking: while I do this here without you noticing)”. The movie would be put on the Index for the reason the woman, “Nina”, became pregnant out of wedlock; but, then, if she behaved morally in the first place, the movie would not have been made.

St. Paul says: “I am not conscious to myself of anything, yet am I not hereby justified; but He that judgeth me is the Lord” (i Cor. iv. 4).

Jesus said, “But he that shall presevere to the End, he shall be saved.

Jesus redeemed us by opening the gates of heaven so that we will have a chance to enter there. He is our Savior, because no one can enter heaven without Him taking us there. Our souls are saved when we die and He takes our souls to heaven.

No one living on earth is saved until Jesus deems them so at death. This is the General Judgment. If we die with mortal sin on our soul, the soul goes to hell. If we die only with venial sins on our soul, the soul is purged of them in purgatory.

Those who think they are saved, they justify themselves, placing themselves as Judge, and commit sin by presumption. In the Last Judgment, our souls join with our bodies, and we all are judged. Even the Saints will tremble at that time, because of the Majestic and Powerful Judge.

One should be prepared at all times by contrite repentance and penance, for no one knows the time of death.

A suggested reading for everyone no matter what one believes, “The Four Last Things”:

http://www.catholicmatters.com/tlft00.htm

Yes. Bella Dodd testified to the Senate Committee in the 1950s and said that the Church was being infiltrated in the 1930s up to present day. The enemies of the Church must eliminate any document against themselves. How Orwellian. Perhaps look for a “Declaration on the Knights Templar” coming soon.

Who made Claud authority over the Church? Or me? Quo Primum had authority because it was DECREED by a valid Pope. Being that John XXIII was no pope, he had no authority. No comparison. What Pope Saint Pius V decreed, or any other Pope, no Pope can change. Hear the Church. St. Joseph’s name was never in the Canon of the Mass. John XXIII’s 60’s Revolution against the Church by inserting St. Joseph’s name in the Canon, proves John XXIII’s rebellion against the Church, her Apostolic Tradition.

Yes I can judge rightly the church in Rome since John XXIII and his false council. THE Vatican Council was not completed, therefore we know that V-2 was false.

I strongly suggest you read what the Church has taught minus Pope Pius XII, excluding John XXIII and his 4 successors.

A missal of Roncalli (John XXIII) was put out by the Vatican which de facto replaced the UNCHANGEABLE Missale Romanum of the Roman Catholic Church Pope Saint Pius V. This CHANGED missal is better known as the “Missal of Pope John 23”. It contains a number of changes, the proof for which is if it did not contain such changes, it would not have needed to be published because the UNCHANGEABLE Missale Romanum of the Roman Catholic Church Pope, Saint Pius V would have continued to be published. But, since the time of the 2nd John 23 (1st John 23 was an anti-pope), the UNCHANGEABLE Missale Romanum of the Roman Catholic Church Pope, Saint Pius V has NOT been published by the Vatican.

Please consider the “Missal of Pope John 23” in general. Please also keep in mind that there are a number of different missals which are known as the “Missal of Pope John 23”. Hence, the better term is the “Missals of Pope John 23”. Why is there more than one “Missal of Pope John 23”?

On Monday, July 25, 1960, John XXIII changed the rubrics for the Breviary and Missal (The Papal Encyclicals, by Claudia Carlen, Raleigh: The Pierian Press, 1990, Vol. 5 (1958-1981), p. 5).

There are a number of different editions of the “Missal of Pope John 23” because, not content with changing the rubrics in 1960 (which, for example, included the deletion of the Confiteor recited by the Altar Server immediately before the administration of Holy Communion during the Mass to the Altar Servers and to the Laity, as well as the omission of the Last Gospel), “Jolly John”, as the secular media was wont to style him, inserted the name of Saint Joseph into the Canon of the Mass on Tuesday, November 13, 1962.

He ordered the suppression of the Leonine Prayers, the prayers prescribed by Pope Leo XIII to be recited after Mass. These prayers were also prescribed by Pope St. Pius X and Pope Pius XI which included the Prayer to St. Michael the Archangel, a prayer that specifically makes mention of the battle that the Church wages against the devil. He removed the Psalm Judica me from the Mass.

John XXIII then suppressed the Last Gospel, the Gospel of St. John. This Gospel is also used in exorcisms.

John XXIII eliminated the second Confiteor in the Mass – that which is said immediately before the Communion of the priest. Only after all these changes did he introduce a change into the Canon of the Mass by inserting the name of St. Joseph. The Canon cannot be changed. The request to have St. Joseph’s name placed in the canon was officially rejected by Pope Pius VII on September 16, 1815 and Pope Leo XIII on August 15, 1892.

The other major changes regarding the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass came into effect the first Sunday in Advent, 1964. To logically consider the implications of the “Missals of Pope John 23” which are NOT identical with the Missale Romanum of the Roman Catholic Church Pope, Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572], We begin with the Laws on the Mass which forbid any changes to the Ancient Roman Rite of the Catholic Mass and the Missal in which this ancient, venerable, august, approved, saint-making Rite of Mass is to be found.

So, for example, here are a few of the Roman Catholic Popes, as well as a Roman Catholic Council, which the 2nd John 23 disobeyed with his “Missals of Pope John 23”:

a) The Canons on the Mass by the Council of Trent, most especially Canons 6 and 9 which explicitly mention the CANON of the Mass (Session 22, Monday, September 17, 1562 A.D.; Text below).

b) QUO PRIMUM TEMPORE (Tuesday, July 14, 1570 A.D.) also forbids any changes to the Missal used for the Mass (Pope Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572]).

c) De Defectibus V (Tuesday, July 14, 1570 A.D.) also forbids any changes to the Missal used for the Mass (Pope Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572]). ( Please note the actual text is given below on the Laws on the Mass, Part Two.)

Besides the self-evident and obvious prohibition against changes to the Missal found in De Defectibus V, which is primarily concerned with the words of the Double Consecration, another legal point which is sometimes missed, perhaps because it is not widely know, is the use of the term “the Order of Mass”, which is to be found within the same place as De Defectibus V.
For example: “6. After the Preface, the Canon is begun inaudibly, and all is done as laid down in the Order of Mass....” (Missale Romanum, Part II, The General Rubrics of the Missal, Chapter XII, The Offertory, Secrets, Prefaces, and Canon, # 6; emphasis added). It should be noted that this precedes Part V, De Defectibus. (Defects which may occur in celebrating Mass).

Another example: “3. If other hosts are to be consecrated....as in the Order of Mass....” (Missale Romanum, Part II, The General Rubrics of the Missal, Chapter VII, From the Offertory to the Canon, # 3; emphasis added).

The “Order of the Mass” is not the Paul VI’s “Novus Ordo Missae” (New Order of the Mass), either.

During the days of Pope Pius XII there was already at least one UPDATED 16th Century PROTESTANT Supper Memorial Meal called “Novus Ordo Missae”, otherwise it would not have been necessary for him to have written Mediator Dei. (Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical MEDIATOR DEI, ON THE SACRED LITURGY, Thursday, November 20, 1947 A.D.).

Therefore, the 2nd John 23 DISOBEYED the Council of Trent, Quo Primum Tempore, Rubricae Generales Missalis, De Defectibus, plus other laws on the Mass by corrupting the Missale Romanum which is the Missal in which The Ancient Roman Rite of the Catholic Mass was RESTORED (NOT destroyed as it was later by the anti-Catholic “Concilium” of Synod Vatican 2) by the Council of Trent with Pope Pius IV and which actual Missal was published by Pope Saint Pius V in 1570, by Jolly John’s tyrannical insertion of the holy name of Saint Joseph into the Canon of the Mass.

Therefore, in conclusion, the so-called Missals of John 23 are NOT “missals” of the Catholic Church nor of the Roman Catholic Church in virtue, not only of the various Laws against changing the Missal and the Rite of the Mass, but also in virtue of the theological principle of Legem credendi lex statuat supplicandi, a.k.a. Lex orandi, lex credendi.

The Missals of John 23 are missals of the Vatican 2 church, NOT the Catholic Church and NOT the Roman Catholic Church!

In Anglo-Saxon English this means that Roman Catholic Bishops and Priests can NOT use the Missals of John 23 and still remain Roman Catholic Bishops and Priests because the Missals of John 23 are NOT the Missal of the Roman Catholic Church.

Juridically, Roman Catholic Bishops and Priests who use one or more of the Missals of John 23 are automatically Excommunicated from the Roman Catholic Church and must seek absolution from Censure from a valid Bishop or Priest of a Catholic or Roman Catholic Church who does not use any of the Missals of John 23 and who is otherwise not a member of the Vatican 2 church.

Theologically, any valid Bishop or Priest who uses any of the Missals of John 23 DOES NOT offer a VALID Mass because of, among other reasons, defect of intention! Remember that the intention for offering a valid Mass must be a PROPER Intention, NOT an IMPROPER Intention. Now the PROPER Intention is to do what the Church does, namely the CATHOLIC Church, NOT the Vatican 2 Church.

But it is a contradiction of terms for a Roman Catholic Bishop or Priest to use a missal from a non-Catholic Church because, to do so, publicly states to the whole world, that such a Roman Catholic Bishop or Priest has apostatized from the Roman Catholic Church by de facto accepting the beliefs of a NON-Catholic Church by using one of the missals or prayer books of a NON-Catholic Church, in this case one of the Missals of John 23.

The use of any such “missal” or “prayer book” by any Roman Catholic Bishop or Priest, besides publicly stating that said Roman Catholic Bishop or Priest has been automatically excommunicated in virtue of his public acceptance of, and overt act of, or belief in, the heresy of false ecumenism, also commits a Mortal Sin by using any of the Missals of John 23 every time he does so.

Any Roman Catholic Bishop or Priest who uses any of the Missals of John 23 has also de facto publicly renounced the Profession of Faith and the Oath Against Modernism which was originally taken by said Roman Catholic Bishop or Priest in accordance with the Codex Iuris Canonici of the Roman Catholic Church, because such a Roman Catholic Bishop or Priest de facto accepts the attacks against the Catholic Rite of Mass by the numerous Protestant Churches whose theology was condemned by the Council of Trent because these Protestant Churches do NOT believe that the Mass is a Sacrifice - only a meal, hence no Transubstantiation, etc., etc. , e.g. a Methodist Church, a Lutheran Church, an Anglican Church or a Vatican 2 church.

Such an ex-Roman Catholic Bishop or Priest is also suspected of the heresy of Modernism, the Censure for which is automatic Excommunication:

“Moreover, in order to check the daily increasing audacity of many Modernists who are endeavoring by all kinds of sophistry and devices to detract from the force and efficacy not only of the Decree Lamentabili Sane Exitu (the so-called Syllabus), issued by Our Order by the Holy Roman and Universal Inquisition on July 3 of the present year, but also of Our Encyclical letters Pascendi Dominici Gregis given on September 8 of this same year, We do by Our Apostolic Authority repeat and confirm both that Decree of the Supreme Sacred Congregation and those Encyclical Letters of ours, adding the penalty of Excommunication against their contradictors, and this We Declare and Decree that should anybody, which may God forbid, be so rash as to defend any one of the propositions, opinions or teachings condemned in these documents he falls, ipso facto, under the Censure contained under the chapter Docentes of the Constitution Apostolicae Sedis, which is the first among the Excommunications Latae Sententiae, simply reserved to the Roman Pontiff. This Excommunication is to be understood as salvis poenis, which may be incurred by those who have violated in any way the said documents, as propagators and defenders of heresies, when their propositions, opinions and teachings are heretical, as has happened more than once in the case of the adversaries of both these documents, especially when they advocate the errors of the Modernists that is, the synthesis of all heresies.” (Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], Motu Proprio, PRAESTANTIA SCRIPTURAE SACRAE, Monday, November 18, 1907).

At least one or more of the Missals of John 23 no longer have the Last Gospel. The prayers of this liturgical Rite of the Catholic Mass, i.e. The Ancient Roman Rite, primarily the Quam Oblationem and the Supplices Te Rogamus, help to provide the Mass Celebrant, who is a member of the Catholic Church, or at least of the Roman Catholic Church, with a Proper Intention.

His internal intention is verified by the external act of his genuflections - acts of adoration of Jesus Christ as God - at the Double Consecration. His internal belief in the Mystery of the Incarnation of Jesus Christ and in the Mystery of Christ’s Hypostatic Union of God and Man is verified by the external act of his genuflection at the Et Verbum Caro Factum Est. (And the Word Was Made Flesh) near the end of the Last Gospel which is the beginning of the Gospel of Saint John.

The Last Gospel was originally inserted into the Mass to reveal Bishops and Priests who were in fact secret heretics who did not believe in the Divinity of Jesus Christ, e.g. Cathars, Albigensians, etc.

If there was no Sacrifice, there could be no Victim, but the immolation of the Victim can only be accomplished by the use of the concomitant conjunction of the Proper Matter, Form and Intention, not in a single Consecration of but one species, but only by the Double Consecration of both species.

Therefore, Roman Catholic Bishops and Priests who use any one of the Missals of John 23 are, at the very least, suspected of being either a Cathar or Albigensian heretic.

During the false Vatican “Two” Council, the principle of the unchanging Canon of the Mass was destroyed with the addition of the name of St. Joseph.

Pope Pius XII dd not changed the unchangeable. John 23rd did.

Pope Saint Pius V’s Quo Primum - “We likewise declare and ordain that no one whatsoever is to be forced to alter this Missal, and that this present document cannot be revoked or modified, but remain always valid and retain its full force. . . . Therefore, no one whosoever is permitted to alter this letter or heedlessly to venture to go contrary to this notice of Our permission, statute, ordinance, command, precept, grant, indult, declaration, will, decree, and prohibition. Should anyone, however, presume to commit such an act, he should know that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.”

Regards.

What was wrong with the Mass prior to 1962???

QUOTE:
Rome, Jul 23, 2007 / 11:11 am (CNA).- In an interview with the Italian daily “ “Il Messaggero”, the director of the German language programming for Vatican Radio, Jesuit Father Eberhard von Gemminger, said he hopes future popes will be elected by a College of Cardinals in which “at least half” of the members are women.

“Why not dream that sixty illustrious women could elect the Pope? I would be happy to see sixty male and sixty female cardinals in the Sistine Chapel,” the German Jesuit said in reference to the total number of permitted cardinal-electors. END QUOTE

There’s 666 in there.

“Mother is always right! Hold onto something long enough and it is bound to come back into fashion”

Sure, the 60s Revolution against America and the Church is coming back.

Since when is KJV any authoritative scripture? King James himself was a heretic from the Catholic Church, butchered the Catholic Scriptures he used while Catholic, then presented his own “scriptures”.

Catholic Church Scriptures will match each Canon Decree.

Ancient Noachide Apostate Pharisees rejected God in Jesus as He walked among mankind, therefore, "You are of your father the Devil, and the desires of your father you will do. he was a mankiller from the beginning, and he stood not in the verities bacause veritie is not in him. when he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own, because he is a liar, and the father thereof."- The Word, Jesus Christ Son of God [St. John 8:44]

Roman Catholic Church teachings are the best! Nothing is omitted. On the other hand, Protestants (who are truly judaized) still have missing books which the Jews took out while re-writing the Scriptures.

Thank God for Dogma!