The two biggest cases are the one that eliminates the Chevron Doctrine and, of course, the Presidential immunity case. Within the Presidential immunity case, the unconstitutional appointment of Jack Smith is extremely important.
I’m a patient at MD Anderson for almost 10 years. Padmanee Sharma married Dr. Allison, who won the Nobel Prize for Medicine because of his invention of immunotherapy for the treatment of certain types of cancer.
She is kind of a bitch, but she is married to Allison. The researcher who wants the credit for her own work is standing up for he rights for the credit of her work. Her work might be subject to getting a patent, and she rightly wants her own name on it so she can collect the royalties.
The simple and correct action the Supreme Court should rule that Jack Smith as Special Prosecutor is unconstitutional, explain why, and state that all the other issues are moot.
Why go through a series of requests? Ask once, them hold Garland in contempt if he doesn’t turn the documents/videos within two weeks. No need to have a fight.
Let the administration bitch about not “negotiating”. When the documents/videos are demanded, the negotiating is over.