Free Republic 1st Quarter Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $81,566
92%  
Woo hoo!! And now less than $6.5k to go!! Let's git 'er done!! Thank you all very much!!

Keyword: democrattreason

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • TERRORISM and COUNTERTERRORISM: News, INFORMATION & Analysis #2

    04/11/2010 9:33:03 AM PDT · by Velveeta · 4,070 replies · 6,773+ views
    Free Republic | 4/11/2010 | FReeper Collaboration
    Obama amputates our nuclear arms By: Charles Krauthammer ...snippet...Under President Obama’s new policy, however, if the state that has just attacked us with biological or chemical weapons is “in compliance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty,” explained Gates, then “the U.S. pledges not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against it.” Imagine the scenario: Hundreds of thousands are lying dead in the streets of Boston after a massive anthrax or nerve gas attack. The president immediately calls in the lawyers to determine whether the attacking state is in compliance with the NPT. If it turns out that the attacker...
  • Al Qaeda Sends a Message to Democrats

    12/22/2006 11:55:34 AM PST · by bnelson44 · 268 replies · 10,762+ views
    Brian Ross and Hoda Osman Report: Al Qaeda has sent a message to leaders of the Democratic party that credit for the defeat of congressional Republicans belongs to the terrorists. In a portion of the tape from al Qaeda No. 2 man, Ayman al Zawahri, made available only today, Zawahri says he has two messages for American Democrats. "The first is that you aren't the ones who won the midterm elections, nor are the Republicans the ones who lost. Rather, the Mujahideen -- the Muslim Ummah's vanguard in Afghanistan and Iraq -- are the ones who won, and the American...
  • Kerry's Nonsense

    09/04/2003 1:52:26 PM PDT · by Molly Pitcher · 1 replies · 104+ views
    National Review online ^ | Sept. 4, 2003 | Rich Lowry
    Kerry’s Nonsense Why did the Massachusetts senator authorize a war of whim? A big question in determining whether the Democrats can take back the White House next year is: Can the party think straight on matters of war and peace? Judging from Sen. John Kerry's performance Tuesday, the answer is "no." Let's try to follow Kerry's argument. First, he says his vote "to threaten the use of force" against Iraq last year was "right." O.K., but why? Presumably because Saddam represented a threat to the region and to U.S. interests severe enough to justify war. Otherwise, Kerry should have voted...