Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $25,907
31%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 31%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: justicekagan

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • 9 Times The Obama Administration Fought Subpoenas or Blocked Officials from Testifying Before...

    06/05/2019 3:04:51 PM PDT · by jazusamo · 9 replies
    PJ Media ^ | June 5, 2019 | Matt Margolis
    Full title: 9 Times The Obama Administration Fought Subpoenas or Blocked Officials from Testifying Before Congress After the long and thorough, and, of course, incredibly expensive Mueller investigation, Democrats were left distraught over a lack of any crime to justify going forward with impeachment. In the wake of the Mueller report, they’ve since promised new investigations in the hopes of finding some crime to justify putting the country through a process that most don’t want us to go through just because Democrats haven’t gotten over the 2016 election. In recent weeks, stories about subpoenas being challenged and Trump officials being...
  • Justice Kagan: What If a President Issues a ‘Proclamation That Says No One Shall Enter From Israel?’

    04/25/2018 3:50:32 PM PDT · by jazusamo · 90 replies
    CNSNews ^ | April 25, 2018 | CNSNews Staff
    Justice Elena Kagan (Screen Capture) (CNSNews.com) - In oral arguments in the case of Trump v. Hawaii today, Justice Elena Kagan suggested as a hypothetical that the United States elects a president “who is a vehement anti-Semite and says all kinds of denigrating comments about Jews,” and that, once in office, this president issues “a proclamation that says no one shall enter from Israel.” “This is an out-of-the-box kind of President in my hypothetical,” Kagan said in an exchange with Solicitor General Noel Francisco as people in the courtroom laughed, according to the transcript and audio recording of the...
  • Texas Two Step and recusal refusal at Supreme Court

    06/28/2015 8:44:00 AM PDT · by Oldpuppymax · 20 replies
    Coach is Right ^ | 6/28/15 | Suzanne Eovaldi
    This week’s Supreme Court decision in regard to legitimacy of homosexual marriage just well may be illegitimate itself whatever way the Court decides. And because of this very fact, 2016 and its crucial election must include initiatives to institute TERM LIMITS for SCOTUS along with a swift and very definitive process for removal of any member of the U.S. Supreme Court! Just consider the fact that their rabid feminism pushed both Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Elena Kagan to “marry” two same-sex couples though they knew full well they were being called upon to give definitive judgment in the...
  • New info indicates Justice Kagan's conflict of interest on ObamaCare

    11/11/2011 12:33:32 PM PST · by Driftwood1 · 6 replies
    Examiner ^ | 11-11-11 | Anthony Martin
    When former Obama Administration attorney Elena Kagan was appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court by Barack Obama, conservatives warned that the nominee was perhaps the most politically partisan Justice that has ever served on the high court. Kagan had served as Obama's Solicitor-General and was responsible for defending his policies in court cases.But new information has surfaced today that may indicate a stark conflict of interest when it comes Kagan and the Supreme Court's decision on the constitutionality of ObamaCare. As a result of a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch and CNSNews in response to the Justice Department's refusal to...
  • New Documents Show Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s Comments on Obamacare

    11/11/2011 10:43:16 AM PST · by OPS4 · 12 replies
    Judicalwatch ^ | 11/10/11 | Judicialwatch
    Washington, DC -- November 10, 2011 Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has obtained three new documents that provide additional information about Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan and the Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare) while she served as solicitor general. Justice Kagan has said she was not actively involved in the Department of Justice (DOJ) discussions regarding Obamacare. Moreover, the Supreme Court justice did not recuse herself from the High Court decision in April 2011 not to “fast-track” for Supreme Court review Virginia’s lawsuit challenging Obamacare. Here is...