Free Republic 1st Quarter Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $21,387
24%  
Woo hoo!! And the first 24% is in!! Thank you all very much!!

Keyword: txattorneygeneral

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Bombshell-Paxton [TX Attorney General] Document Unmasks Corrupt Prosecutors

    11/21/2017 8:08:00 PM PST · by JeepersFreepers · 24 replies
    Empower Texans ^ | November 20, 2017 | Tony McDonald
    In August, the Wall Street Journal Editorial Board labeled the case against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton a “political prosecution” citing a sealed grand jury document provided to the editorial board. That document has now been published for the public to view by Direct Action Texas, a North Texas-based political accountability group and its contents are alarming. The document, a motion to dismiss filed by Paxton’s legal team, lays bare a number of violations of Paxton’s due process rights by Special Prosecutors Brian Wice and Kent Schaffer, as well as Chris Older, the original judge on the case. Oldner was...
  • Saxet gun show draws eager buyers (TX)

    01/26/2013 4:54:46 PM PST · by bgill · 22 replies
    KXAN ^ | Jan. 26, 2013 | John Bumgardner
    This is the first day of the gun show since the City of Austin discussed possibly banning from the Travis County Expo Center. State law, however, prevailed because the move would have proved illegal in Texas... “It took 20 minutes to park the truck and about an hour waiting in line,” Another group, One Million Moms for Gun Control marched at the Texas Capitol... The group expected over 100 participants to join in the Austin event.
  • Did Texas just de-recognize marriage ?

    11/19/2009 9:51:32 AM PST · by MetaThought · 42 replies · 2,236+ views
    Fort Worth Star-Telegram ^ | Wednesday, November 18, 2009 | Dave Montgomery
    Texas' gay marriage ban may have banned all marriages AUSTIN — Texans: Are you really married? Maybe not. Barbara Ann Radnofsky, a Houston lawyer and Democratic candidate for attorney general, says that a 22-word clause in a 2005 constitutional amendment designed to ban gay marriages erroneously endangers the legal status of all marriages in the state. The amendment, approved by the Legislature and overwhelmingly ratified by voters, declares that "marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman." But the troublemaking phrase, as Radnofsky sees it, is Subsection B, which declares: "This state...