Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) Evolution the Lie
Creationist

Posted on 02/18/2007 11:15:33 AM PST by Creationist

The Theory of Evolution is a wound upon society inflicted by proclaimed erudite men. This festering wound is easily transmitted. It is spread into almost every thing children read at public school; fictional books, geography, biology ECT. ECT.. It is portrayed by Hollywood This travesty is supported by our tax dollars and is never corrected when proved wrong, it is destroying our society with its Godless belief. It will be said that they can not afford new book, well just rip out the pages that are incorrect or mark them out with a permanent marker.

This hypothesis has been proved incorrect at every turn. Even the author of the revolution or “god to the hardened believer, Darwin, had doubts in his belief. Darwin expected the future to find factual evidence in support of this miraculous idea. Over 150 years later still no proof. Why in fact there is more evidence to the contrary discovered by scientist who do not accept Jesus. The mountain of evidence against the theory is so compelling, yet those who can not or will not except a Supernatural power as the Creator of it all continue to make up hypothesis’s that require supernatural power to make it happen.

Evolution can not happen, changing from one species to another. They will show “microevolution,” really adaptation or variation as evidence. This is not so because there is not a new species, they are still roses, horses, dogs, cats, corn, ECT. ECT.. What are the supposed mechanisms of evolution; mutations and natural selection. Well natural selection can not do it and it should really be called random selection. Natural selection only selects at random, it takes intelligence to select a particular one. Random acts would almost never pick the exact correct sequence. Mathematicians will tell you random selection is chaotic and would never create intelligent organization. Mutations can not do it. Mutation are 99.9% harmful to the organism. What does not kill it or make it sterile makes it weaker and less likely to survive. If by chance it does, the DNA stasis will act upon the organism and if it has offspring they will revert back to the original within a generation or two.

The only way is for the “Hopeful Monsters” that Goldschmidt dreamt up. Millions of mutations happening at once about every 50,000 years, beneficial, happening to 2 males and 2 females in a close proximity each pair giving birth to the exact same kind of new species one male and one female. What that means folks is one breeding pair of lizards gave birth to a male chicken and within a mile or less another breeding pair of lizards gave birth to a female chicken, both with the right organs to breed and continue the new species. Whew! if that is not a faith based belief then what is. When is the next 50,000 years up?

Though the theory in general does not claim origins but it is in text books, Chemical evolution. Chemical evolution is a proposed process which does not exist today ( therefore it is not science and is a religious belief ) in which a reducing atmosphere ( no evidence in the rocks for this ) existed and rain fell upon rocks and created a chemical soup in our oceans. Lighting struck a puddle and life appeared with all the complexity of DNA and RNA installed. Stanley Miller performed an experiment in a controlled environment in which he created simple amino acids both D and L (left and right handed). Every type of amino acid in animals is left handed, no animal or man could live with right handed (D) in them. Every time amino acids are synthesized in a laboratory they create equal amount of left and right. If it can not be done in a controlled atmosphere with billions of dollars, how can random actions ever be expected to do it.

Evidence for evolution is just not there. The fossil record shows no evidence of transitional forms. There is nothing in the Precambrian that supports lower life forms evolving into the Cambrian Explosion. Evolutionist can not explain why there is a explosion of complex organisms in the Cambrian layer. This layer of evidence is condescending to their theory and they do not wish to acknowledge it as so. The slow processes of today could not create the sedimentary rock layers we see in the geology. The fossil layers the coal fields the sedimentary rock are all best explained by the global flood of Noah’s time.

Evolution has no proof, only conjecture believed by millions. Excepted by these millions because they are told by the government funded educated people of self proclaimed expertise. As the Bible says and how the Super rich and high up government official believe we are sheep, cattle to the latter, following believing expecting our leaders to tell us and teach us the truth. This is not going to happen, there is an agenda to this theory, it is to undermine God’s authority and to make people believe they are nothing more than animals. You teach then they are animals and they will act like them just look at how much the world has changed in the past 70 or so years due to the mandated teaching of this godless theory.

Every day more is discovered and science tries to explain it with their complex naturalistic ideals that defy the laws of nature and physics. When the answer is so simple God whose name is Jesus Created it all in six literal 24 hour days, and he did not use evolution anywhere in his process.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: fsmdidit; goddidit; noonelooksatkeywords; satire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 321-327 next last
To: Creationist
A tank is a rolling cannon and is not a rifle, even though the barrel is rifled.

The majority of tanks have smoothbore guns, including the Abrams. All early firearms were also smoothbore.

The tank is a variation and adaptation of the field cannon

The earliest tanks carried machine guns, not cannons. Also, a cannon is the exact same concept as a rifle, only larger, and fits the exact definition of a rifle that you provided earlier.

Armored cars a product of need for protection from rifles and is not a rifle, it does not have the ability to shoot, it can be shot from but is not a gun plat form.

All military armored cars carry either machine guns and/or cannons, unless you're an idiot, thinking of a Brinks armored car.

Rockets are technology completely separate of rifles they are not shot from a barreled device except for a few smaller rocket propelled devices RPG....

Early rockets used gunpowder for propulsion. The development of rocketry came from the use of gunpowder in rifles and cannons and the underlying concept is the same. One led to another, as plain as day to any non-idiot. But it's pathetic that you can admit that an RPG rocket, rocket assisted artillery round, or a missle from a tank cannon is the same and yet at the same time throw your hands up in the air and claim they're not.

I guess the expansive power in the steam engine had no play upon the use of a cylinder engine.

Yes it did, but it's explosive power that runs a combustion engine, not steam.

You see an non idiot which I may not be would understand that evolution requires that the organisms change into a new organism with out adding any thing from the outside world except pressure, and time.

No, I don't expect you to understand since evolution requires far more than pressure and time. To complicated for your feeble brain. You have an entire universe in front of you where every living and non-living thing changes and evolves constantly, yet you see nothing. For you it's all magically prepackaged and predestined to the point where you might see how an ice-box could turn into a refrigerator, but absolutely not an air-conditioner.

241 posted on 02/18/2007 9:37:11 PM PST by Black Powder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Black Powder
Your claim of my understanding is your only coarse of action to protect your belief in a process that does not exist.

If that helps you sleep at night then I am glad I could help.
242 posted on 02/18/2007 9:41:07 PM PST by Creationist ( Evolution created it all from nothing in 15 billion years. Thats' not religious faith?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Black Powder; Creationist
Armored cars a product of need for protection from rifles and is not a rifle, it does not have the ability to shoot, it can be shot from but is not a gun plat form.

It's not?

243 posted on 02/18/2007 9:47:11 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Science is a real Thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Creationist

yes, and the fact that the awesome scientific data about creationism not being allowed in public schools further shows the lack of truth of evolution. The darkside doesn't like to be exposed...the nutty evolution thoughts in many scientists heads are right from the darkside maskerading as knowledge.


244 posted on 02/18/2007 9:47:35 PM PST by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Creationist
Your claim of my understanding

Let's be clear. I don't claim that you understand anything.

is your only coarse of action to protect your belief in a process that does not exist.

Yeah, sure. Four thousand years ago we were wearing bedsheets pressing figures into clay. Now we're sitting in front of computers arguing with throwbacks to those days. Nothing evolves. It's all majick.

245 posted on 02/18/2007 9:55:45 PM PST by Black Powder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

My bad my thoughts were on the Armored cars used to deliver money to and from banks.


246 posted on 02/18/2007 9:58:55 PM PST by Creationist ( Evolution created it all from nothing in 15 billion years. Thats' not religious faith?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Black Powder
You said, "No, I don't expect you to understand"
is a claim of my understanding.

Adaptatation and variation are not evolution.

Nothing evolves it varies, it adapts, or a complete new system is devised by an intelligent being.
247 posted on 02/18/2007 10:06:03 PM PST by Creationist ( Evolution created it all from nothing in 15 billion years. Thats' not religious faith?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Creationist
Sorry you are wrong

If the decision of a jury, be it in a court of law or a UN committee be not objective, nothing is.

248 posted on 02/19/2007 8:45:14 AM PST by RightWhale (300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

That looks like a serious design error. All those APCs with artillery on top are top heavy, which is fine so long as it stays on a paved road. I'd prefer the model with twin 50s.


249 posted on 02/19/2007 8:53:52 AM PST by RightWhale (300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

I was standing in my driveway last night. I was looking to the stars and said to myself, there is no way our existence is in anyway shape or from some random occurance. What got me looking upward was a show on the History channel about meteorites. What drove my thought was my belief and faith in God.


250 posted on 02/19/2007 10:44:18 AM PST by Bruinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Creationist

So Darwin would be the Jesus of the evolutionists?


251 posted on 02/19/2007 10:54:02 AM PST by Bruinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Pox

There is only one God, and the bible is the word of that one God. The Koran and other texts are just that texts. They do not represent the one God responsible for our existence. They are works of fiction. They are the books that the control the masses you refer to.


252 posted on 02/19/2007 11:04:31 AM PST by Bruinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Bruinator

And I can state precisely the same of the bible and that one so called God.

There is no proof to your claim, but you are welcome to your beliefs.


253 posted on 02/19/2007 12:15:51 PM PST by Pox (If it's a Coward you are searching for, you need look no further than the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Bruinator
So Darwin would be the Jesus of the evolutionists?

I don't remember anyone claiming Darwin to be the son of God.
254 posted on 02/19/2007 12:18:48 PM PST by Pox (If it's a Coward you are searching for, you need look no further than the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Pox

It wasn't you I directed this to. Sorry for the confusion


255 posted on 02/19/2007 12:24:05 PM PST by Bruinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Pox
Wow Pox

For some one who has threaten me if I talk about God to them sure seems to know enought that Jesus is the son of God, He is God also.
256 posted on 02/19/2007 12:54:19 PM PST by Creationist ( Evolution=alternative to believing in God to justify their moral shortfalls and animal behavior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Creationist

And the sun revolves around the earth.


257 posted on 02/19/2007 12:55:55 PM PST by TKDietz (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz

???????????????????????????????????????????????


258 posted on 02/19/2007 12:57:08 PM PST by Creationist ( Evolution=alternative to believing in God to justify their moral shortfalls and animal behavior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Creationist
Ecclesiastes 1:4 "A generation goes and a generation comes, But the earth remains forever.

The definition of "forever" according to Miriam-Webster is: 1 : for a limitless time 2 : at all times : CONTINUALLY

Isn't this the Bible in fact saying that the world has been around a very long time, as in billions of years, or forever? Doesn't this conflict with your interpretation of Genesis?

259 posted on 02/19/2007 1:37:36 PM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Creationist
Just as you have in the entire thread, you cannot resist lying/exaggerating what it was I posted.

Disingenuous.
260 posted on 02/19/2007 1:48:57 PM PST by Pox (If it's a Coward you are searching for, you need look no further than the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 321-327 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson