Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Scientist: 'We should fear a deep temperature drop -- not catastrophic global warming'
Climate Depot ^ | October 27, 2009 | Habibullo Abdussamatov

Posted on 10/27/2009 10:07:42 AM PDT by ClimateDepot.com

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 10/27/2009 10:07:43 AM PDT by ClimateDepot.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ClimateDepot.com

BFL


2 posted on 10/27/2009 10:10:01 AM PDT by Mama Shawna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClimateDepot.com

Mankind should fear governments, not climate.


3 posted on 10/27/2009 10:10:27 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClimateDepot.com

the Russians should fear it more than us. How many degrees can the earth lose before there are no grain crops in Russia?


4 posted on 10/27/2009 10:13:31 AM PDT by silverleaf (Ours is the only country on earth with a ventriloquist dummy for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; SunkenCiv
Глобальное похолодание Ping
5 posted on 10/27/2009 10:15:15 AM PDT by BIGLOOK (Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

No Mas Vodka


6 posted on 10/27/2009 10:19:35 AM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom sarc ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy; TenthAmendmentChampion; FrPR; enough_idiocy; ...

Beam me to Planet Gore !

7 posted on 10/27/2009 10:20:09 AM PDT by steelyourfaith (Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison! to s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClimateDepot.com
Want to proove that CO2 is a farce!???

Ask a bunch of scientists what they would do to reverse global cooling if it ever occurred.

Odds are they would come to the consensus that CO2 would not be a significant tool.
8 posted on 10/27/2009 10:21:22 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z3n

Thanks. Interesting point!


9 posted on 10/27/2009 10:23:07 AM PDT by ClimateDepot.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: z3n
Odds are they would come to the consensus that CO2 would not be a significant tool.

Or at all useful based on ice core data. Ice core data shows C02 rise follows temperature rise, not the other way around.....

10 posted on 10/27/2009 10:45:29 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ClimateDepot.com; Black Agnes

This scares the crap out of me.
Time to buy more rice!


11 posted on 10/27/2009 10:52:59 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Mankind should fear governments, not climate.

Zactly!

(Almost tag-line material 8^)

12 posted on 10/27/2009 10:56:22 AM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClimateDepot.com
Cooling could be really, really bad. Consider New York City under the ice - Long Island is a terminal moraine. How about the most fertile farmland in the country either under ice or tundra. How about humanoid settlement in Britain has never made it through an ice age?

Still, if the pattern of the past revealed in the ice cores holds, we're not yet to the next interglacial maximum.

13 posted on 10/27/2009 11:20:31 AM PDT by colorado tanker (Mr. Flyingsaucerballoonboymediawhoreman - this Bud's for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

We will beg and pray for global warming if we end up with global cooling.


14 posted on 10/27/2009 11:24:49 AM PDT by peeps36 (Democrats Don't Need No Stinking Input From You Little People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClimateDepot.com

This is an excellent paper, but it won’t matter. Global warming isn’t about climate, and it isn’t concerned with the welfare of mankind. It is a scheme to transfer wealth and power to centralized rulers, increasing their ability to rule and the dependency the ruled will have on them. Our Founders had a vision of a new world order based on liberty, freedom and individualism. It was the freeing of man to achieve his greatness, the antithesis of the old world concept that there were rulers and the ruled. The new regime has a very different agenda, a different vision that sees the necessity of a new, enlightened ruling class, and it is them. Global warming is a way to transfer power from the old world to their new world vision. They don’t care if the ruled are cold or hot, dead or alive, as long as power and wealth continues to be theirs.


15 posted on 10/27/2009 11:30:43 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Ice core data shows C02 rise follows temperature rise, not the other way around.....

Am I the only one who struggles with a theory that includes effects that precede the cause? How is it that the warmth comes first and the CO2 that causes the warmth follows it?

It would seem much more reasonable to conclude that the rise in CO2 is an effect, like the carbonation leaving your diet Pepsi as it reaches room temperature. But that would leave you to search for a reasonable explanation for the global temperature rise, something like the variations in the amount of solar energy being emitted.

But then no one could blame mankind, and that is unacceptable.

16 posted on 10/27/2009 11:37:06 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski (No good deed goes unpunished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Of course, Texas, Louisiana, et al, will add 100 miles more or so of land as the Gulf of Mexico recedes (the water is locked up in the glaciers).

Imagine Galveston 100 miles inland. Lots of very productive cropland possible on what used to be ocean bottom.


17 posted on 10/27/2009 11:44:42 AM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Senator_Blutarski

The CO2 could be released from tundra that is thawing as the Earth warms.


18 posted on 10/27/2009 11:45:45 AM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ClimateDepot.com

The chill is on.

Ice ages can occur in as little 20 years and last hundreds of years.

19 posted on 10/27/2009 11:51:39 AM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darth

That’s a good point, when we get deep into the next ice age a lot of continental shelf will be land again. Many of us think there’s going to be some good archeology done in the future on the shelf around the world.


20 posted on 10/27/2009 11:54:14 AM PDT by colorado tanker (Mr. Flyingsaucerballoonboymediawhoreman - this Bud's for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson