Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BushCountry

“He [the jugde] is allowing Acosta back in....”

Your use of the word “allowing” presumes this judge has the final word. That remains to be seen. It is not clear whether this opinion is binding on the White House. Even if it is a court order, which it seems not to be, it would be subject to appeal.

“A little research is everyone friend.”

A bit condescending, and patience is also our friend.

Let’s see how this plays out. I say this is a PR stunt by CNN and the only way Acosta gets his pass back is if the President wants to give it back.

Why would POTUS want to do that? Well, Acosta publicly humiliated himself and embarrassed CNN with his rude and atrocious behavior.

Trump is known for handing people rope...


71 posted on 11/16/2018 10:53:03 AM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: enumerated

A bit condescending.

Not really, 90% or more of the posts on this thread have nothing to do with the ruling. No one stated that the final ruling hasn’t been made, that all the judge did was re-instate his hard pass because it was revoke without procedure, that no one has to call on Acosta, that they could revoke Acosta pass at anytime if the follow the procedure for revoking a hard pass, etc... The whole thread has been doom and gloom.


72 posted on 11/16/2018 11:01:56 AM PST by BushCountry (thinks he needs a gal whose name doesn't end in ".jpg")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson