Posted on 07/15/2019 11:42:47 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The LGBT agenda is like a hydra; a multi-headed monster that attacks society on several different fronts.
At first, the movement gained acceptance through positive portrayals in the entertainment arts. Later on, the LGBT mafia began infiltrating the education system, imposing its rather totalitarian brand of “inclusion” on children and families. Lastly, they are ratcheting up their efforts to reshape society through state and federal legislation.
Saints, we can turn off the TV or boycott certain shows, we can pull our children from schools that shove sexual perversion down their throats, but what recourse will we have if these people are still able to change laws according to the agenda to an Orwellian degree?
This is the startling reality we may face if the U.S. Supreme Court upholds a lower court decision that redefines the word “sex” in federal law to mean “gender identity.”
If the law protects an individual’s right to determine their own reality and decide their own gender, even the gentlest opponents of such anti-science and anti-faith practices will instantly become criminals.
Attorneys for Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) are fighting this terrifying prospect at every front.
On behalf of a Michigan funeral home forced by the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to allow a male employee to break their sex-specific dress code and wear women’s clothing at work, ADF filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to take the case.
Back in 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan ruled in favor of the funeral home. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), however, appealed to the 6th Circuit court who then ruled in favor of the employee.
(Excerpt) Read more at activistmommy.com ...
Roberts scares the heck out of me on these issues.
Kavanaugh, not sure yet.
SCOTUS rules on scrotum, and Americam discourse sinks to a new low.
Doesn’t the SCOTUS have better things to spend its time on without wasting time on defining words?
Is this what our country has come to? Definition of words by popular vote of the judiciary at taxpayer expense?
Human sexuality is biological, with two sexes.
Standard English is linguistic, with several genders.
SCOTUS ceased to support rule of law and objective reason decades ago.
Gender is a vocabulary term, so they are promoting Newspeak, from 1984.
Gender identity cannot replace the science of biology regarding sex.
The EEOC is another bureaucratic agency that needs to be eliminated. ....It may have served a purpose when it was created many decades ago, but it’s useless today. JMO
Then, when they use DNA as evidence, they can say, “The sample came from a person formerly known as a male. We have information this person has decided to be a female so we cannot prosecute unless this person reverts to male status.”
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.