SCOTUS Set To Rule On The Redifinition Of “Sex” As “Gender Identity”

The Activist Mommy ^ | July 12, 2019 | The Activist Mommy

[ealgeone]

Cases like this are why we need two more rock solid conservatives.

Roberts scares the heck out of me on these issues.

Kavanaugh, not sure yet.

[Prince of Space]

I remember being “told” a decade ago that “God doesn’t make mistakes,” when it comes to homosexuals. Therefore I had to accept that they were “perfectly normal ppl made according to God’s design.” Now I’m being “told” again that God made a mistake and put them in the wrong body. So which is it? 🤣

[American in Israel]

SCOTUS rules on scrotum, and Americam discourse sinks to a new low.

[metmom]

Doesn’t the SCOTUS have better things to spend its time on without wasting time on defining words?

Is this what our country has come to? Definition of words by popular vote of the judiciary at taxpayer expense?

[YogicCowboy]

Human sexuality is biological, with two sexes.

Standard English is linguistic, with several genders.

SCOTUS ceased to support rule of law and objective reason decades ago.

[NetAddicted]

Gender is a vocabulary term, so they are promoting Newspeak, from 1984.

[Chode]

[octex]

Gender identity cannot replace the science of biology regarding sex.

The EEOC is another bureaucratic agency that needs to be eliminated. ....It may have served a purpose when it was created many decades ago, but it’s useless today. JMO

[trebb]

Then, when they use DNA as evidence, they can say, “The sample came from a person formerly known as a male. We have information this person has decided to be a female so we cannot prosecute unless this person reverts to male status.”

[Albion Wilde]

bump