Posted on 03/28/2024 7:38:31 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision on Fischer v United States this summer which means hundreds of J6 cases could be upended.
Biden’s corrupt DOJ has charged more than 300 J6ers with 18 USC §1512(c)(2). Additionally, two of the four charges against Trump in Jack Smith’s DC case are conspiracy to obstruct so the Supreme Court’s ruling could torpedo the special counsel’s case against Trump as well.
Last week US Attorney from DC Matthew Graves fired a warning shot to the US Supreme Court – and J6ers serving time for 18 USC §1512(c)(2), the ‘obstruction’ statute pending before SCOTUS.
US District Judge for the District of Columbia Tim Kelly, a Trump appointee, is also threatening to add enhancements to remaining convictions if 1512c2 is reversed by the Supreme Court.
Judge Kelly threatened J6 defendant Gilbert Fonticoba, who was recommended a 62-month jail sentence for entering the Capitol building for 3 minutes.
The judge said he will add time to Fonticoba’s sentence if the Supreme Court reverses the ‘obstruction’ statute.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
murderers in liberal cities have spent less time in jail than the J6 protestors!
Your exactly right.
Meant you’re
Wouldn’t it be interesting if the USA had its own playtime with guillotines like the French did?
Hmmmmmm….
...and we go around the world DEMANDING countries like Hungary, Serbia, Russia, and Israel ‘reform’ their Justice Systems to be as ‘impartial’ as ours.
SICKENING!
Gee, that’s not vindictive at all. 🙄
Don’t federal judges serve at the pleasure of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Ct.?
How in hell can a judge bring charges against anyone?
a liberal is practically the seventh son=- they can do anything and get away with it- their father, the evil one protects them
They have already neen convicted of or pked guilty to several crimes. If SCOTUS vacates some of the convictions, the judge merely wants to rearrange the punishments for the remaining crimes, e.g. making concurrent sentences instead run consecutively.
Seems to me the judge shouldn’t be able to do that.
It’s a good thing a liberal judge did not see your error. You’d be looking at 6 years.
And have gotten better treatment, too.
The crime doesn’t matter to the judge. He has in his mind what the sentence is. Even if it is just jay walking. He should not be a judge. He isn’t qualified to be a dog catcher either.
“murderers in liberal cities have spent less time in jail than the J6 protestors!”
A reckoning is coming.
“How in hell can a judge bring charges against anyone?”
They’re not charges, they’re enhancements to the sentencing options the judge has after a guilty verdict.
That said, I would hope SCOTUS would bat that down viscerally.
Screaming Nazi judge Roland Freisler would be so proud.
It’s called jucidical butt hurt, brought on by being upbraided by his superiors.
Pretty sure that’s off the charts illegal. Not that this tyrant cares.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.