Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/16/2009 12:37:30 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts

Could we first destroy ACORN? Then, we’ll see if we can talk atheists out of their bloodthirsty ways, ok?


2 posted on 09/16/2009 12:42:07 PM PDT by BertWheeler (Dance and the World Dances With You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; GourmetDan; Fichori; ...

Ping!


4 posted on 09/16/2009 12:48:46 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

THE MINOR PHYLA


5 posted on 09/16/2009 12:50:48 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

ROFLMAO.

Science doesn’t destroy Darwinism. Even your deliberate misunderstanding and misrepresentation of science doesn’t.

But it is amusing.


6 posted on 09/16/2009 12:55:52 PM PDT by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

(here we go down the rabbit-hole again)

Ba’et bashak ushlay pachzar
Be’afsay-chak savsu, makdo:
au az chilcain haya nimzar
umtay-aran kairdu.

“Gura bnee, min hapiton
mai ‘chod-shino, chil-ziparno!
mayof-girgir tanoos, za’on
maychetesh bim’gono!”

Vehu shalaf saypho hachaz:
nad, cheepace et pechik-tzarav —
veko amad betzel zamzam,
tapoos beheerhoorav.


7 posted on 09/16/2009 1:28:00 PM PDT by tumblindice (Some racist cut me off in traffic today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
“...even the most cautious opinion holds that 500 million subsequent years of opportunity have not expanded the Cambrian range, achieved in just five million years. The Cambrian explosion was the most remarkable and puzzling event in the history of life.”
(Steven Gould, The Richness of Life, pg. 217)

The Cambrian explosion becomes even more of a refutation of Darwinism as time goes on and eventually either Darwin will have to tossed overboard or Darwinism so modified as to not be recognizable as such.

Either way Darwin is being dismantled.

8 posted on 09/16/2009 1:45:47 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
No offense, but making a movie doesn't reinforce the scientific argument, particularly when your movie set out to prove a point. This has as much bearing on the subject as "An Inconvenient Truth" has on proving Global Warming or "Pinocchio" has in proving that puppets can become boys.
9 posted on 09/16/2009 1:46:24 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts; Admin Moderator

Shouldn’t these articles be in General/Chat?


19 posted on 09/16/2009 9:23:42 PM PDT by NewLand (What does 0bama know and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
cording to Darwin’s theory, all living things are modified descendants of a common ancestor.

Sounds like ID.

21 posted on 09/16/2009 10:21:29 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
Since 1859, however, many Precambrian fossils have been found, including microfossils of single-celled bacteria in rocks more than three billion years old.

So the Earth is over 3 billion years old?

OK....

So, because Darwin didn't find microscopic and soft-bodied Precambrian fossils in the precambrian.....150 years ago.....that means something?

24 posted on 09/17/2009 6:39:08 AM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (Didja know that Man walked with vegetarian T. rex within the last 4,351 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson