Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earth’s days used to be just 18 hours long, but the Moon changed that
BGR.com ^ | 6 Jun 2018 | Mike Wehner

Posted on 06/07/2018 3:49:48 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT

describes how the researchers created a method to rewind Earth’s clock by hundreds of millions of years. The system allowed the team to paint a rough picture of what a day on Earth might have been like over a billion years in the past, and better explain the evidence of climate shifts that have been observed in ancient rocks.

The researchers note that if you take the timeline back far enough, looking 1.5 billion years in the past, the Moon would have been close enough that Earth’s gravity would have destroyed it. That obviously didn’t happen, but since the Moon is over 4 billion years old there was clearly an important piece missing from the data.

(Excerpt) Read more at bgr.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; lunarorigin; moon; themoon
The cavemen only had to do six-hour shifts.

Did they get time and a half for over six?

Sounds like a better deal than the old French metric clock. That metric calendar is totally wrong; only one Sunday every ten days.

1 posted on 06/07/2018 3:49:48 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

The cavemen only had to do six-hour shifts.

cavewoman only had to do 4 hours.


2 posted on 06/07/2018 4:00:31 PM PDT by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

FWIW...

As a child in a church-going family, I always wondered why the biblical 900+ year lifespans changed to 70-100, and whether it had to do with lunar vs solar calendars....


3 posted on 06/07/2018 4:12:22 PM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jolla

The cavemen only had to do six-hour shifts.

cavewoman only had to do 4 hours.

Have you ever made up a rock bed or had to butcher
and cook a brontosaurus?

And after that have sex with a hairy man who smelled
like a mammoth and could only grunt his feelings.

Wait, that might as well be today...
no, feelings weren’t invented till the rise of feminism.


4 posted on 06/07/2018 4:20:01 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jolla

Pregnancies were only 6 months long.


5 posted on 06/07/2018 4:22:44 PM PDT by Radix (Natural Born Citizens have Citizen parents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

God only worked 18 hours a day... lazy slackard?
/smile smile smile


6 posted on 06/07/2018 4:22:48 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicans aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

The real cause of Global Warming??? [/sarc]


7 posted on 06/07/2018 4:23:58 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

So I have to bust my hump at work for an extra two or three hours because of the Moon??? Damn Moon!!!! (Shaking fist at Moon)


8 posted on 06/07/2018 4:50:34 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Barney Rubble was one he’ll of an actor


9 posted on 06/07/2018 4:54:08 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom Hi Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Radix

Pregnancies were only 6 months long.

???
I’d have to remove my shoes and socks, for the higher math need to solve this question.

And unsure about the lunar period of the time.

The human gestation of about 280 days @ 24 hours per day, will need more ‘short’ days to equal the needed time?

Just like the problem about the train leaving NYC going west at 32 MPH and another Eastbound from LA at 14.3 m/sec... How long for the boring machine to do the work?
Same thing, only different.


10 posted on 06/07/2018 5:06:54 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (This Space for Rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

YES!
With longer days, more sunlight, more heat buildup.


11 posted on 06/07/2018 5:10:33 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (This Space for Rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; Abathar; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...
Note: this topic is from 6/07/2018. Thanks DUMBGRUNT.
The researchers note that if you take the timeline back far enough, looking 1.5 billion years in the past, the Moon would have been close enough that Earth’s gravity would have destroyed it. That obviously didn’t happen, but since the Moon is over 4 billion years old there was clearly an important piece missing from the data.
What's missing? Admission that the Moon hasn't always been in orbit around the Earth, but was captured in a series of encounters, which also led to plate tectonics.


When the Days Were Shorter
by Larry Gedney
Alaska Science Forum
Present-day nautilus shells almost invariably show thirty daily growth lines (give or take a couple) between the major partitions, or septa, in their shells. Paleontologists find fewer and fewer growth lines between septa in progressively older fossils. 420 million years ago, when the moon circled the earth once every nine days, the very first nautiloids show only nine growth lines between septa. The moon was closer to the earth and revolved about it faster, and the earth itself was rotating faster on its axis than it is now. The day had only twenty-one hours, and the moon loomed enormous in the sky at less than half its present distance from earth.

12 posted on 07/11/2018 4:32:55 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

From the lunarorigin keyword, out of the FRchives:

13 posted on 07/11/2018 4:33:15 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

[reprising an edited saved bit] V.A. Firsoff (Valdemar Axel Firsoff, as it turns out) wrote a lot of books, including Strange World of the Moon published back in 1959, ten years before the manned landings started, and even before the first robotic landers.

Due to his volcanism bias -- and remember, he was writing right on the cusp of the "plate tectonics revolution", which has blindered geology worse than the knee-jerk uniformitarian gradualism that preceded it -- he wasn't able to accept that the Moon's impact craters were in fact from impact, and attributes them instead to volcanism caused by the Moon's capture by the Earth (as well as contraction of the lunar sphere). He appears to envisage three encounters between the formed Moon and the Earth, resulting in temporary capture twice leading to the eventual outright capture.
...the Moon clearly could not have been the satellite of the Earth then, for a total period of about 2,000 million years... Spurr points out that the face of the Moon shows two systems of great surface fractures, or faults, lying about 30 degrees from the two poles and trending from west-south-west to east-north-east. This is explained by him as a result of the halting of the Moon's rotation... Curiously, the face of the Earth, too, shows a similar structure, with the same general trend -- the Highland Boundary Fault... The poles of the Earth would also seem to have shifted place on at least three occasions, in the Cambrian, Permian, and (lastly) Quaternary Periods, bringing ice and cold to previously warm lands... some mighty force made the crust of the Earth slip (the rotational stability of the axis of a mass as large as the Earth is enormous) and the position of the poles wobbled... there exists on the Moon a triple grid of surface fractures... perpendicular to each other within each grid, the grids being of different ages... Cambrian, Perm-Carboniferous, and Tertiary.
Firsoff's basically given us a snapshot of the problems inherent with a fission origin (having settled on an overspin origin for the Moon, very early in the history of the Earth), not least of which is that the fission origin also requires in orbit formation of the lunar sphere and capture by the Earth, while showing that capture is possible. Capture of the Moon, irrespective of its place and era of formation, is the simplest model.
14 posted on 07/11/2018 10:20:03 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

thanx


15 posted on 07/11/2018 11:48:40 PM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

My pleasure.


16 posted on 07/12/2018 1:17:05 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson