Seriously, I’ve wondered about the ARMY of agents under one man, AG Barr in the Department, that he will have to muster to investigate the investigators and the Congress critters, the 5 Eyes connected to our weaponized JD and FBI, the Obama appointees and his Cabinet, Hillary Campaign, DNC, Perkins Couie, the Podestas, Fusion GPS, the Media mafia, human trafficking, the Popester.
I mean, really, it can’t ALL be done by Justice Department before Statute Limitations apply.
Sooo,.... this better be Already a Military operation in some meaningful numbers and ways. Imho, of course.
There is no statute of limitations for federal crimes punishable by death, nor for certain federal crimes of terrorism, nor for certain federal sex offenses. Prosecution for most other federal crimes must begin within five years of the commitment of the offense. There are exceptions.Nov 14, 2017 https://www.google.com/search?q=rico+statute+of+limitations&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS763US763&oq=rico+sta&aqs=chrome.2.69i57j0l5.8343j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Further, I believe that investigation-wise the work is already done if good guys have all the NSA data. From the link in #233 under rules of evidence for military tribunals in the first chart. Actual voice/written communications would certainly have 'probative value to a reasonable person'. probative value. n. evidence which is sufficiently useful to prove something important in a trial.
Lest I be accused of not posting the second half of the definition. The second half doesn't apply in a military tribunal setting. Just that is sufficiently useful to prove something important in the trial. A defendant's actual words or written words would seem to fit. If the source is an issue, there are tons of retired with TS SCI clearances from when they were active in their billets.
I don’t think statue of limitations applies if they’ve already got an investigation open.
Well, that may not be right but, Wikipedia says, coincidentally about the specific crime we are discussing:
“When an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to impair the court’s impartial performance of its legal task, the act (known as fraud upon the court) is not subject to a statute of limitation.”
Also, heinous crimes such as fraud, murder, and treason are not covered by SoL although it has happened in such as a cold murder case that the court has thrown it out as being too stale.