Image: Salman Rushdie (edited), a “lucky” victim of Muslim violence, for he survived the deadly attack against him. YouTube screen grab.
Posted on 12/21/2023 4:24:11 AM PST by MtnClimber
Despite the constant hectoring about Islam being a religion of peace, a snapshot of Muslim conduct worldwide shows the claim is a lie as to the faith’s devout adherents.
Merriam-Webster’s dictionary describes the word “phobia” as “an exaggerated, usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation.” In the wake of recent events, is fear of Muslims, labeled “Islamophobia,” really exaggerated, inexplicable, and/or illogical?
I’ve concluded that not only is fear of Muslims logical and explicable, but it is by no means exaggerated and, most probably, understated. The deliberately misleading term “Islamophobia” itself amounts to a cudgel used to silence critics of what Dutch Parliamentarian (and possible new Dutch Prime Minister) Geert Wilders has at times characterized as a totalitarian political ideology masquerading as a religion.
I could enumerate just some in the endless litany of recent (and even not-so-recent) violent attacks that radical Muslims have perpetrated in (delusional) Western societies that welcomed and unsuccessfully attempted to absorb and assimilate large numbers of Muslims. However, Raymond Ibrahim has already done so, writing extensively (and magnificently) about historical events that provide countless examples (here and here) of aggressive Muslim behaviors resulting in widespread slaughter. His writings elucidate numerous historical episodes consuming people of all ethnicities and religions, including their fellow Muslims, with particular cruelty reserved for Africans, Armenians, and, of course, Jews.
Why has
- Geert Wilders been (in his own words) “deprived of a personal life” requiring constant police protection for more than a decade?
- Salman Rushdie had to spend the last 35 years in fear? (And note that his fear was justified.)
- Hoover Institute fellow Ayaan Hirsi Ali, now a Christian, who was both abused and mutilated by “Imams” as a child, been living “with round-the-clock security...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Image: Salman Rushdie (edited), a “lucky” victim of Muslim violence, for he survived the deadly attack against him. YouTube screen grab.
Satan - The father of lies
Irrational prejudice is one thing.
Conditioned response is something else.
Leftoids lack the brain cells to understand the difference.
The greatest anti-truth, anti-freedom,, anti-individual, anti-life collective in the history of CIVILIZATION and it still exits and is growing.
%2Farchive-images.prod.global.a201836.reutersmedia.net%2F2016%2F08%2F18%2FLYNXNPEC7H0KA.JPG&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=17293ba732214987e276589c653fe6fd04a66ee497c7b50c72d94fc201b48c69&ipo=images)
Are sheep “prejudiced” against dogs and wolves?
The First Amendment needs two supplements:
1) Any religion that worships Satan shall be illegal in the US.
2) Allah is Satan.
Repulsion is not fear.
islamomisia is rational as well.
Islam is a cancer.
It ain’t paranoia if they really are picking on you.
And Muslims can pick on people really, really hard. And they don’t think they have to tell you why, they attack like maddened murder hornets.
And you don’t even have to whack their hive with a stick.
Everything I needed to know about Islam I learned on Sep 11. Then I read the Quaran and some of the hadiths and realized I was right.
When a central tenet of a religion is to convert or kill anyone who is not a member of that religion, I’d say it’s reasonable to fear members of that religion.
I think “revulsion” is the word you want, but I agree with the sentiment entirely.
A devout muslim wants to kill you for not being muslim. A “moderate” muslim wants the devout muslim to kill you for not being muslim.
And a tolerant, inclusive muslim doesn’t want to see you killed, but they won’t say anything against the devout or moderate muslims for fear of their own lives.
What kind of religion does that?
I thought about the word “revulsion” which is true but I think I’m more repelled by them and homos (making “homophobia” false as well). Just don’t want to be near either.
Merriam-Webster’s definitions of “repulsion”, especially #3:
1: the action of repulsing : the state of being repulsed
2: the action of repelling : the force with which bodies, particles, or like forces repel one another
3: a feeling of aversion : REPUGNANCE
It fits.
I remember those pictures. It was a monstrous, horrific event.
Now here’s the thing. Details of Nazi mass murders are well-known. And the events are discussed to this day. But everything related to Muslim mass murders is buried. Those events are forgotten by most people. The same will eventually happen with the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023.
And for those not in the know, here’s an article about the Muslim mass murder your picture is from.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.