Posted on 01/11/2024 12:15:52 PM PST by logi_cal869
Bingo. That’s exactly what they’re doing.
Next up: a study to show that cardiac arrest among 15-29 year-olds increased by 7% from 2000 to 2019! But 2021 to the present...crickets
It did not for me, which I how I was able to post it (I subscribe to NOTHING!).
Try a different browser and/or clearing your cache (cookies/history/etc). They may have a ‘2 article limit’ as some subscription sites have and you may have cookies which are blocking you.
I’ll tell you exactly what it is (but don’t tell anyone /s):
It’s the declining state of people’s immune systems, for which the biggest link in the chain is the gut.
Just wait until the results of 2020-2023 come in; they won’t have a leg to stand on in defense of all their plandemic actions and the jabs.
Blaylock on COVID Vaccines
“. . . Studies, including autopsy examinations of people who died soon after receiving the vaccines, demonstrated that the messenger RNA (mRNA) and the nano-lipid carrier that contain it continually generated the virus’ spike protein, which is the dangerous part of the virus. This spike protein was then found throughout the vascular system, attached to the inner walls of blood vessels, including microvessels.
Furthermore, researchers found that those spike proteins were constantly causing the body to generate inflammatory chemicals called cytokines―even in the heart and the nervous system. . . .
Because of this cascade of events, we are seeing a dramatic rise in deaths, nervous system diseases, and new brain diseases that can be expected to continue for as long as the mRNA from vaccines continues to make spike protein―possibly for a lifetime.
New studies have shown that by the administration of the third COVID booster, a person has no remaining functional immune system. It has simply been burned out. As a result, they are susceptible to all kinds of infections―including viral, bacterial, and fungal. . . .”
(The Blaylock Wellness Report, November 2023, pages 3, 4)
I got news for ya. The jab is not a “vaccine”. They changed the definition of “vaccine” to accommodate the jab.
And what happened to people’s guts and immune systems before 2021 to increase GI cancers? In younger adults specifically?
Surely epidemiologists looking at vaccine exposure and cancer rates would control for age.
I am not hugely concerned about the childhood vaccines causing cancer. But I threw the increase out there as one generational change among many.
Beyond the killed and inactivated pathogens in vaccines, the kind of antigens we evolved to deal with, there are preservatives, adjuvants, biological impurities and other possible contaminants.
However, there is a world of science beyond her expertise that she won't entertain, no matter how compelling. She's accepted her level of proficiency as unassailable (It was in a book, it must be true!!) by anyone who's learned a different approach to the subject. She is blind to the possibility that what she accepts as fact are just models in need of a greater depth of understanding, models waiting to be reworked once research that conflicts with the model seems to explain the real world more accurately. She seems to hold that her conclusions are superlative to any suggestions by mere mortals.
Thank you, well put.
Very sad.
https://people.com/michael-strahan-daughter-isabella-reveals-brain-tumor-diagnosis-8425058
Actor Adan Canto—of Designated Survivor, Narcos, and X-Men—Dies of Cancer at Age 42
https://time.com/6553760/adan-canto-actor-designated-survivor-cancer/
Do insurance companies have to go before state regulators if they want to significantly increase their rates?
Will group health, disability and life insurances rates need to be raised before insurance companies costs are going up due to increased claims?
Will the insurance companies show regulators the data on all the claims they had to pay out due to cancer?
The data is out there and it will come to light.
Forget it. The vaxcrackers are immune to facts.
Doctors with 10 years of extensive professional training are baffled?
I have only two crummy little years of seminary training, and I’m not baffled in the least.
Except that it's not a few hours, there is research showing it is a few months and it winds up in tissues that are never touched by a normal viral infection.
And you already destroyed your credibility by equivocating eating a steak to getting an injection.
And normal vaccines are better than getting the disease because they work. The vaccinated people I know get COVID several times a year. Vanishingly few "unvaccinated" people have had more than one infection and those that do measure the time between infections in years, not weeks.
Baffled, eh? After a mass vaccine campaign. Baffled, like the news media after a murderer yells, “Ahoo snackbar.”
Would have been the same response if results had been to the present. Remember the ‘deep state’ pronounced the clot shots and boosters ‘safe and effedctive’.
Fauxi and his band of misanthropes would never lie to you, would they? </sarc>
But as merely ONE component of a complicated puzzle, this chart serves to elaborate on why young adults - vs older adults - might be more susceptible to disease (cancer being but one expressed disease):
Educated beyond her intelligence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.