I'd keep eye on her she's nothing but an infiltrator and careerist...
VP??? Do not think she is ready...
Was not familiar with her til she did her rebuttal, she seems nice but I dont think she’s VP material..her rebuttal was too, well over dramatic, sad one second and happy the next was just weird. I think she was trying to talk more to suburban Moms but not sure if it worked besides I dont think its a good idea to have a sitting senator as VP we need the seats
Her rebuttal was like fingernails on a chalkboard to me. I had to change the channel. I could see how it might appeal to the emotions of single suburban women.
Besides having a vagina, what are her qualifications?
Two years in the Senate, and zero executive experience.
This better be a troll.
The Hill trying to rile up conservatives with this garbage.
Just pundits typing nonsense when they have nothing else to say and want some clicks.
Katie Britt is a newbie in terms of being on the world stage. But she is no stranger to politics and gave a pretty good SOTU rebuttal if one can move past the first few minutes.
But I understand that some people don’t like the way she looks or sounds. She’s a new Senator and her positions are decent.
I don’t see her becoming Trump’s VP. Trump is just stirring up buzz.
Yeh...right..slow news day...
Katy Twitt
Yet another Debby Do-Right who will fumble the ball
Wow, that cringeworthy performance warrants a VP slot?! Is the bar that low?
Source: The Hill.
Might as well come from Politico or Newsweek.
I had to shut her off...unbearable.
The left would love nothing better than for Trump to pick Britt, or someone like her, as his VP. Ain’t gonna happen.
So, from the statement below ...
“The first-term senator is also thought to be in contention to be picked as former President Trump’s vice presidential pick. Trump praised her rebuttal, stating she distinguished herself and presented compassion for “women’s issues.””
... she is now a contender for Trump’s VP slot? Who is “thinking she is in contention” ... once again the “some in Washington” or “unnamed sources”.
This is a BS article. Just because Trump said some nice things about her doesn’t automatically make her a contender for his VP in the election.
Just a BS headline to get clicks.
Not a good pick. She won’t bring Trump any votes he’s not already getting and won’t shore up his base. Plus, she’s not experienced enough.
Correct. Haley was a “tea party” candidate.
Bingo. Britt is a lightweight who leveraged McConnell’s dark money and the churchy persona to smear and eventually defeat a solid conservative who had one of the highest voting records with Trump in the house.
Mo Brooks was a Freedom Caucus member and a solid NO vote for McConnell’s reelection as Speaker. McConnell needed a puppet and Shelby’s former chief of staff was the perfect patsy.
Bull crap. She’s a Ukraine funding queen, avoids Trump like the plague and hasn’t said anything about the 2020 election being stolen, and she’s McConnell’s girl. She’s the Proto typical post turtle. Silent on the J6 hostages. Utterly on qualified for her job.
No women for VP. Trump needs a strong man who will be able to lead MAGA after his term ends.
Female politicians are always RINOs because they have already become unconservative by not staying home and submitting to their husbands as scripture commands.