Your other options simply are not. They are viewed as acceptable losses to most of Islam. You're really worried about enraging the Muslim world after they make NYC and LA smoking craters? Wake up.
Actually, just bloody ignorant. We are not in conflict with terrorists, or even, radical Islam. We are at war with Islam. These acts have the strong support of the vast majority of the Moslim population. This is Islam. Always has been. From the beginning. Wake up.
OK we nuke Mecca, then what happens?
"Radical Islam" = "the actual teachings of the pedophile muhammed (may he spend eternity encased in pigs' meat).
A few links:
Islam, a Religion of Peace®? Some links...
The Agenda of Islam - A War Between Civilizations (cease-fire tactic) <<-- THIS ONE IS REALLY IMPORTANT!!!!
I agree. The islamofacists need to know the consequences of a nuke going off in a US city. It won't be pretty
You're right on. If they obliterate NYC it's all over and the only suitable reply is to vaporize Mecca. I don't think these primatives would know how to deal with such a response. However, I do disagree with you including LA as an important target for Islamic terrorists. What would they bomb, Union Station? After all, there is no there there and nobody would notice!
Actually, just bloody ignorant. We are not in conflict with terrorists, or even, radical Islam. We are at war with Islam. These acts have the strong support of the vast majority of the Moslim population. This is Islam. Always has been. From the beginning. Wake up.==
You are right. But islam and islamists are not stronger then former Soviet Union. They are not even near as productive as USSR. SO they can be defeated.
My question is why not in US to forbid evil ideology completely?
They forbid totalatarian sects. Only better from it.