Posted on 02/26/2014 7:33:18 AM PST by Seizethecarp
Shrimpton reported Obama's purported mom was not pregnant in 1961 and that Obama was born in Kenya in 1960. He said Kenya was under British intelligence files and that Obama's father ran guns for the Mau Mau. He then dropped a bombshell claiming the CIA did covert DNA testing on Obama at a fundraising dinner and the test came back with no match to the claimed grandparents. Shrimpton said Rudy Giuliani's people knew and sat on the intelligence and further stated he spoke with Hillary Clinton's people and that they were quite interested.
(Excerpt) Read more at birtherreport.com ...
“Obama’s father ran guns for the Mau Mau...”
HA!
Why do you peddle this carp?
You make money off it?
Manchurian Candidate.
Single children often find their parents adopted them. Just saying. In that case 0 DNA would NOT match his grandparents only his mothers DNA
Whose DNA would also not match her “parents”
Hillary was supported by Phillip Berg. He did file suit The first to do so IIRC
I disagree, the nobama experiment was about MONEY. The lib/dems with Soros, Buffett and many others have made out like bandits cleaning out the Treasury. Of course they had to give the liberals (socialized medicine) and holder’s people (reparations) some of what they wanted to keep them “on the team” long enough.
Even the hardest progressives know better than gilflirt the Golden Goose to death. They got what they could, now will be time for dummy GOP to come back in to rebuild the money pile. History does repeat itself!
Interesting theory.
If the family really were multigenerational spooks, there should be some decent background files somewhere.
Interesting.
Of course, the way things are going, Kenyans insist he was born here.
“What about Stanley’s friend in Seattle who they claim saw Stanley with a newborn whose diapers she barely knew how to change? Stanley was enrolling in the University of Washington. I thought this was summer of 1961.”
What we have here are a long list of claims by Shrimpton. All, some, or none of them could be true. Evidence and witnesses must corroborate EACH claim.
Shrimpton says it was confirmed that Stanley Ann was not pregnant in July 1961. Perhaps she gave birth to Barry in June? Shrimpton does not say how intelligence services confirmed that she was not pregnant specifically in the month of July 1961. Nor does he say how he assumes a birth date was pushed back to 1960 (no month given).
Someday, fifty or sixty years from now, some historian somewhere with a full set of balls is going to write finally about the fraudster who conned his way into the White House despite being constitutionally ineligible.
The tone of the study will be to marvel at the stupidity of the electorate of this time period, and to relate, step by step, just how severely the nation was damaged by this charlatan’s deliberate betrayal of public trust and his misanthropic Marxism - in tandem with a Leftist populace who wanted nothing more than to sack the public coffers and grab everything they could grab.
The book will go on to discuss at length the complicity, and even treason, of those in the media who supported all this.
However, by then, of course, it’ll be far too late to do anything about it, and - given the current cooperation of the American leftist bloc - no one should seek to read such a thorough study for fifty years, at least.
Does anyone recall if they introduced him as such at the 2004 Democrat convention?
Shrimpton’s blog:
http://theshrimptonreport.blogspot.com/
Thanks for the ping to Shrimpton’s blog.
I am re-pinging as all hands will be needed to track down how credible Shrimpton is.
Two things gave is a nobama reelection in 2012. First was 4 million “libertarian/conservative purists” sitting out a vote for a Mormon and second just enough dem vote fraud in key states to insure nobama reelection.
I did not like Mitt much either, but its demn impossible to argue that even at Mitt’s worst, he would not have been better than nobama.
Susan Blake.
2500 miles from Honolulu, Susan Blake has to show Stanley Ann how to change ityy-bitty baby Barak’s diaper.
The video used to be here:
It is no more...
Freepers were looking for documentation to support a fellow freepers memory. She had been a missionary in Kenya and said he was born there
News articles were disappearing as soon as we found them.
But , yes, the pattern seemed to be while senator the dialogue changed from being from Kenya to the current. There may be something if you can find before or while running for state senate. Believe me many have looked but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t overlooked
Thus my tag line
Of course something will be done. The GOPs will fall over themselves rushing to pass the amnesty bill, erect a 40' statue of him on the front lawn of the WH and rename all the MLK streets to Hussein Hwy 2 Hell.
There were no problems with McCain’s eligibility.
Susan Blake changed itty-bitty baby Barry’s diaper because Stanley Ann can’t handle it...
http://theobamafile.com/_family/AnnaSusanBlake.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.