Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chicago Tribune: Liberals Not Liberals, But Progressives
NewsBusters.org ^ | 12/15/2005 | NewsBusters

Posted on 12/16/2005 5:09:40 AM PST by Mike Bates

Today's Chicago Tribune story on a group protesting Republican Congressional efforts to curb social spending identifies Rev. Jim Wallis as a "Christian activist." The article reports he is a leader of "a Christian social justice group" and speaks of "Wallis and other progressive religious leaders."

It would be more accurate to describe Wallis as an activist liberal Democrat. He's long been a force within the Democratic party and, as noted in the Weekly Standard, has a " 35-year history of effectively pacifist, anti-capitalist, pro-socialist positions. With the exception of abortion and family values, the political issues that animate him today are the direct descendants of those that launched him into a career of activism back in his student days, when he and his friends were being tear-gassed protesting U.S. involvement in Vietnam, in the heyday of the New Left."

Yet the Chicago Tribune article doesn't even include the word "liberal." The opposite of conservative no longer is liberal, apparently. It's "progressive."


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: calltorenewal; evangelicalcovenant; marxist; marxists; socialist; socialists; sojourners; wallis
And yet some still describe the Chicago Tribune as an extremely conservative newspaper.
1 posted on 12/16/2005 5:09:41 AM PST by Mike Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
Democrat. Progressive. Socialist. Leninist. Marxist.

A piece of sh** by any other name still stinks as bad.

2 posted on 12/16/2005 5:15:40 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
Wouldn't one have to be in favor of progress to be a progressive? There is no progress to be found in the few plans the defeatocrats propose.
3 posted on 12/16/2005 5:18:02 AM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
"Democrat. Progressive. Socialist. Leninist. Marxist.

A piece of sh** by any other name still stinks as bad."

Perfectly stated, no need to add to that.

4 posted on 12/16/2005 5:18:24 AM PST by GregoTX (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

Progressive is fine with me. The word progressive is seen more in communist and socialist organizations and in their propaganda than the word liberal. Just google "progressive = communist" and you'll see what I mean.


5 posted on 12/16/2005 5:18:42 AM PST by ladtx ("It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it." -- -- General Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
Chicago Tribune: Liberals Not Liberals, But Progressives ie., The Leopard said, "Dahling, it's the spots that got smaller"
6 posted on 12/16/2005 5:19:51 AM PST by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW
Wouldn't one have to be in favor of progress to be a progressive?

The left does this all the time.

There's a segment of society which has higher than average rates of Depression, substance abuse, unusual diseases, physical abuse of the people they love and, not surprisingly, very high suicide rates. We call these people "gay" but they are not happy.

And Progressives are the ones who think economic, social, and political ideas from the 1930's are still cutting edge.

Orwell had this pegged 60 years ago. War is Peace.

7 posted on 12/16/2005 5:25:52 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
Shakespeare (Romeo and Juliet):

"What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other word would smell as sweet."

Conversely, "That which we call a liberal skunk by any other word would smell as foul."

Leni

8 posted on 12/16/2005 5:26:52 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
They try to mainstream the guy by using his religious affiliations. They add progressive to religion and all the sudden many readers don't hear socialist.
9 posted on 12/16/2005 5:30:59 AM PST by satchmodog9 ( Seventy million spent on the lefts Christmas present and all they got was a Scooter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
And yet some still describe the Chicago Tribune as an extremely conservative newspaper.

Compared to the NY Times and friends they are very conservative. Compared to the average American they are slightly to the left. It's all relative.

10 posted on 12/16/2005 5:31:58 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Compared to the NY Times and friends they are very conservative.

The Tribune routinely - at least four times in the past two days - carries material provided by the New York Times News Service.

11 posted on 12/16/2005 5:49:40 AM PST by Mike Bates (Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

Whenever I hear the words "social justice," I have a pretty good idea that socialist "justice" is what's intended.


12 posted on 12/16/2005 5:51:12 AM PST by Mike Bates (Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
"Progressive" is the term the Communists decided to use (people not liking "communist") after they gave up calling each other "fellow travelers".

I find it amusing that modern liberalism has jumped back on the bandwagon of coveting the "progressive" trademark. Given its communist roots, I frankly can't think of anything more appropriate.
13 posted on 12/16/2005 5:59:32 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

14 posted on 06/19/2006 7:08:04 AM PDT by redstatesrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: redstatesrock

My guess is the guy hated Nixon because RMN wouldn't provide universal dental care.


15 posted on 06/19/2006 7:10:03 AM PDT by Mike Bates (Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson