Posted on 07/25/2010 7:44:44 PM PDT by Researchers_research
I am sick of black or liberal racist "activists" branding all conservatives as "racists," I thought that Bush advanced blacks like: Condi Rice and C. Powel, so did the GOP with M. Steele.
But I guess according to Shirley Sherrod's theology if a white person is victim of a black person he/she's allowed to be racist against blacks...
First they went after the TeaParty to defame all whites as "racists" now it's all conservatives-bashing-fair-game time...
Jul 23, 2010 ... Sherrod: Breitbart wants to take us back to the days of slavery. ... It could also be that Anderson Cooper does not want to challenge her because ... How much would you like to see ole' Shirley go up against Megyn Kelly? .... I understand that people felt bad because she lost her job, and that they ...
hotair...Breitbart.tv » Sherrod Says Fox News Wants to Roll Back Clock on ... Jul 22, 2010 ... Don't really think she wants to go down this road. ... How about this Shirley, How about if we go back to before we had slavery. .... And it would be a POS like the Mexico that people are running away from. .... will want to Roll Back The Clock once they see the Election scores ...
Breitbart.tv...
Do you realize that, by polling percentage, youd have to be in a room with at least TEN blacks before youll find one who realizes the truth that Øbama is DESTROYING America? How does that fact help race relations?
America will never rid itself of the problems of race as long as people like Jesse Jackson can earn a paycheck by playing the race card at the drop of a hat.
It’s time all conservatives take the race cards we’re dealt and rip it up in their effing faces! Laugh the baiters right out of the room. We’re not your white guilt-riddled dancing monkeys any more. Stick your hate accusations up your ass, chumps!
I suppose we don't have to play by their rules, but it is not necessarily a bad idea to point out to them what their rules really are.
I thought Ann Coulter did a nice job of that with Rick Sanchez:
COULTER: Oh, no, no, no. There's a $100,000 reward for anyone who can produce a video of someone calling John Lewis the N-word one time, not to say 15 times.Maybe they would back off, if they are put in their place.That reward has been out there for three months.
SANCHEZ: And you're convinced that because no one has taken the money that it didn't happen?
COULTER: There is more evidence that you have a problem with kiddie porn. I have as much evidence for that as you do that John Lewis was called the N-word.
And, by the way, in fact, I have more evidence because there hasn't been the press searching all over you, trying to find your problem with kiddie porn, and a $100,000 reward for anyone who can produce evidence of your problem with kiddie porn.
So, I have a lot more evidence that you have a problem with kiddie porn than that any Tea Partier ever called John Lewis the N- word one time, forget 15 times.
Coulter put Sanchez in his place. I wish him the best of luck proving that he is not addicted to kiddie porn.
That's very good. Thank you. It DOES get frustrating to be put on the defensive, but good for Ann.
“If there are hardly any nonwhites at conservative events, the obvious reason is that there are hardly any nonwhites who are conservatives. The nonwhites all on the left. So why are you criticizing conservatives for the fact that liberals are liberals? More to the point, why are you criticizing white conservatives for the fact that virtually all nonwhites reject conservatism? Why aren’t you criticizing nonwhites for being exclusively liberal? The fact is that whites are pretty evenly divided between liberals and conservatives. But nonwhites are virtually all liberal. Why aren’t you asking why this is so? Why aren’t you asking why nonwhites universally reject small government, individual responsibility, and traditional American patriotism?
“Again, you make monstrous insinuations against conservatives for being disproportionately white (which is not true, since whites are divided between conservative and liberal), while you decline to raise the slightest critical question about nonwhites for being almost exclusively liberal. If there is any ‘disproportionality’ or ‘exclusiveness’ here, it’s not among the whites, it’s among the nonwhites. But you treat the nonwhite liberals as victims, because they reject conservatism, which is something they have a choice about, while you accuse the white conservatives of being racists, simply because they are white, which is something they don’t have a choice about. In short, you are calling whites morally evil, simply because they are white. So YOU are the racists. YOU are the ones who paint people in hateful terms, because of their race. YOU are the ones who stir up hatred against a group, solely because of its race.”
Of course it doesn’t occur to a single white conservatives in America to ask these questions and put the left on the defensive, for reasons I’ve given many times.]”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.