Sick of militant-black or liberal "activists" branding all conservatives as "racists"

[TruthHound]

Do you realize that, by polling percentage, you’d have to be in a room with at least TEN blacks before you’ll find one who realizes the truth that Øbama is DESTROYING America? How does that fact help race relations?

America will never rid itself of the problems of race as long as people like Jesse Jackson can earn a paycheck by playing the race card at the drop of a hat.

It’s time all conservatives take the race cards we’re dealt and rip it up in their effing faces! Laugh the baiters right out of the room. We’re not your white guilt-riddled dancing monkeys any more. Stick your hate accusations up your ass, chumps!

[TChad]

Why do we have to do this?

I suppose we don't have to play by their rules, but it is not necessarily a bad idea to point out to them what their rules really are.

I thought Ann Coulter did a nice job of that with Rick Sanchez:

COULTER: Oh, no, no, no. There's a $100,000 reward for anyone who can produce a video of someone calling John Lewis the N-word one time, not to say 15 times.

That reward has been out there for three months.

SANCHEZ: And you're convinced that because no one has taken the money that it didn't happen?

COULTER: There is more evidence that you have a problem with kiddie porn. I have as much evidence for that as you do that John Lewis was called the N-word.

And, by the way, in fact, I have more evidence because there hasn't been the press searching all over you, trying to find your problem with kiddie porn, and a $100,000 reward for anyone who can produce evidence of your problem with kiddie porn.

So, I have a lot more evidence that you have a problem with kiddie porn than that any Tea Partier ever called John Lewis the N- word one time, forget 15 times.

Maybe they would back off, if they are put in their place.

Coulter put Sanchez in his place. I wish him the best of luck proving that he is not addicted to kiddie porn.

[Mark17]

Coulter put Sanchez in his place. I wish him the best of luck proving that he is not addicted to kiddie porn.

That's very good. Thank you. It DOES get frustrating to be put on the defensive, but good for Ann.

[ventanax5]

“If there are hardly any nonwhites at conservative events, the obvious reason is that there are hardly any nonwhites who are conservatives. The nonwhites all on the left. So why are you criticizing conservatives for the fact that liberals are liberals? More to the point, why are you criticizing white conservatives for the fact that virtually all nonwhites reject conservatism? Why aren’t you criticizing nonwhites for being exclusively liberal? The fact is that whites are pretty evenly divided between liberals and conservatives. But nonwhites are virtually all liberal. Why aren’t you asking why this is so? Why aren’t you asking why nonwhites universally reject small government, individual responsibility, and traditional American patriotism?

“Again, you make monstrous insinuations against conservatives for being disproportionately white (which is not true, since whites are divided between conservative and liberal), while you decline to raise the slightest critical question about nonwhites for being almost exclusively liberal. If there is any ‘disproportionality’ or ‘exclusiveness’ here, it’s not among the whites, it’s among the nonwhites. But you treat the nonwhite liberals as victims, because they reject conservatism, which is something they have a choice about, while you accuse the white conservatives of being racists, simply because they are white, which is something they don’t have a choice about. In short, you are calling whites morally evil, simply because they are white. So YOU are the racists. YOU are the ones who paint people in hateful terms, because of their race. YOU are the ones who stir up hatred against a group, solely because of its race.”

Of course it doesn’t occur to a single white conservatives in America to ask these questions and put the left on the defensive, for reasons I’ve given many times.]”