http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2626215/posts?page=242#242
Its already been debunked as far stretching by Glenn Beck people..this is ridiculous
Once again, every attack on Gov. Palin
is from backstabber Romney or his bastard Team.
Once again, Soros' partner in JET BLUE, Mitt Romney,
plays both sides. Spoiler and sore loser, Romney is.
George Psoriasis infects everything. There are millions of people involved in organizations that he supports. Everything is a ‘game’ to the man who wants to ‘rule the world’.
This connection should be fully investigated by Sarah and Beck.
Perhaps he’s a mole - perhaps he has ‘seen the light’. It seems clear that he is a real person. Let’s begin there.
Pick me Pick me....... I’ll check Sarah Palin for moles. :)
You can't walk ten feet in the political circles of Washington without stepping in some money Soros crapped out.
Be very careful, a knucklehead troll got zotted yesterday for posting the same crap..........
N T S A
The left’s “divide and conquer” strategy seems to be working on some weak-minded fools.
- JP
Or maybe she has the mole inside Soros’ camp??
LOL
It is disappointing to see her being advised by a neo-con.
That’s not good news for the future.
Even if he happened to have worked for a company that Soros owned doesn’t mean he was working for Soros’ personal interests. Soros own so much, I wouldn’t be surprised if we have FReepers who work for one of his companies.
My my.... what a salacious title for a thread....
Why do you only post articles by Marc Schenker? What do you think of Mitt Romney?
The presence of Mr. Scheunemann is no big deal, really.
What should really interest Palin fans is the air of palace intrigue that permeates this article. I'm sure that it's a very real phenomenon. And, while it's rather unseemly, it's also to be expected.
Of more interest, is the author's evident worry that Mr. Scheunemann will somehow lead her astray. I think the basis of that worry is that the author (and those who share his concern) doesn't really know what Sarah Palin stands for on matters of foreign policy. Given that she's never spoken in any depth on the subject, there's no way of knowing whether she has any ideas of her own.
This is one of the problems with setting one's hopes on a candidate with no background or record -- observers have no way of comparing her actions or ideas against past history, to see if it marks a change; nor is there any way to discriminate between her own mind, or the minds of her advisers. When all is said and done, the basis of political support for a candidate like that ... it boils down to hope.
Of course, being surrounded by palace politics has a positive benefit for Palin. Any good ideas can be attributed to her; and any bad ideas can be blamed on her advisers -- she's always protected, and never sullied in the eyes of her supporters.
Patrick J. Buchanan
August 22nd, 2008
Who is Randy Scheunemann?
He is the principal foreign policy adviser to John McCain and potential successor to Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski as national security adviser to the president of the United States.
But Randy Scheunemann has another identity, another role.
He is a dual loyalist, a foreign agent whose assignment is to get America committed to spilling the blood of her sons for client regimes who have made this moral mercenary a rich man.
From January 2007 to March 2008, the McCain campaign paid Scheunemann $70,000 — pocket change compared to the $290,000 his Orion Strategies banked in those same 15 months from the Georgian regime of Mikheil Saakashvili.
What were Mikheil’s marching orders to Tbilisi’s man in Washington? Get Georgia a NATO war guarantee. Get America committed to fight Russia, if necessary, on behalf of Georgia.
Scheunemann came close to succeeding.
Had he done so, U.S. soldiers and Marines from Idaho and West Virginia would be killing Russians in the Caucasus, and dying to protect Scheunemann’s client, who launched this idiotic war the night of Aug. 7. That people like Scheunemann hire themselves out to put American lives on the line for their clients is a classic corruption of American democracy.
U.S. backing for his campaign to retrieve his lost provinces is what Saakashvili paid Scheunemann to produce. But why should Americans fight Russians to force 70,000 South Ossetians back into the custody of a regime they detest? Why not let the South Ossetians decide their own future in free elections?
Not only is the folly of the Bush interventionist policy on display in the Caucasus, so, too, is its manifest incoherence.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates says we have sought for 45 years to stay out of a shooting war with Russia and we are not going to get into one now. President Bush assured us there will be no U.S. military response to the Russian move into Georgia.
That is a recognition of, and a bowing to, reality — namely, that Russia’s control of South Ossetia and Abkhazia and occupation of a strip of Georgia cannot be a casus belli for the United States. We may deplore it, but it cannot justify war with Russia.
If that be true, and it transparently is, what are McCain, Barack Obama, Bush, and German Chancellor Angela Merkel doing committing the United States and Germany to bringing Georgia into NATO? For that would commit us to war for a cause we have already conceded, by our paralysis, does not justify a war.
Not only did Scheunemann’s two-man lobbying firm receive $730,000 since 2001 to get Georgia a NATO war guarantee, he was paid by Romania and Latvia to do the same. And he succeeded.
Latvia, a tiny Baltic republic annexed by Joseph Stalin in June 1940 during his pact with Adolf Hitler, was set free at the end of the Cold War. Yet hundreds of thousands of Russians had been moved into Latvia by Stalin, and as Riga served as a base of the Baltic Sea fleet, many Russian naval officers retired there.
The children and grandchildren of these Russians are Latvian citizens. They are a cause of constant tension with ethnic Letts and of strife with Moscow, which has assumed the role of protector of Russians left behind in the “near abroad” when the Soviet Union broke apart.
Thanks to the lobbying of Scheunemann and friends, Latvia has been brought into NATO and given a U.S. war guarantee. If Russia intervenes to halt some nasty ethnic violence in Riga, the United States is committed to come in and drive the Russians out.
This is the situation in which the interventionists have placed our country: committed to go to war for countries and causes that do not justify war, against a Russia that is re-emerging as a great power only to find NATO squatting on her doorstep.
Scheunemann’s resume as a War Party apparatchik is lengthy. He signed the PNAC (Project for the New American Century) letter to President Clinton urging war on Iraq, four years before 9-11. He signed the PNAC ultimatum to Bush, nine days after 9-11, threatening him with political reprisal if he did not go to war against Iraq. He was executive director of the “Committee for the Liberation of Iraq,” a propaganda front for Ahmad Chalabi and his pack of liars who deceived us into war.
Now Scheunemann is the neocon agent in place in McCain’s camp.
The neocons got their war with Iraq. They are pushing for war on Iran. And they are now baiting the Russian Bear.
Is this what McCain has on offer? Endless war?
Why would McCain seek foreign policy counsel from the same discredited crowd that has all but destroyed the presidency of George Bush?
“Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence … a free people ought to be constantly awake,” Washington warned in his Farewell Address. Our Founding Father was warning against the Randy Scheunemanns among us, agents hired by foreign powers to deceive Americans into fighting their wars. And none dare call it treason. contin....
SOURCE:
http://buchanan.org/blog/pjb-and-non...t-treason-1049
I think this article originated from Pat Buchanan and was taken up by the Ron Paul brigade and now Soros is in the news they’re bring it back to the table. Buchanan didn’t back up his allegations so who knows what the heck is going on anymore.