[philman_36]

Actually he condemns violence in the place of legal or political solutions.
What does he suggest in the event that legal or political solutions have no effect? Surrender and simply accept the chains?
There has to come a point in time when even he has to concede that revolution, and therefore violence, is required and necessary.
What's his tipping point? Where is his line in the sand?
(or has he simply not articulated any views relating to these questions to date since doing so would, of necessity, cost him his job?)

He’s all for self defense and has made sure his family is armed and trained.
That's nice. However, your reply doesn't directly answer my original question. If he's offered no opinion then I can understand the lack of an appropriate answer.

[cripplecreek]

I can’t answer for Beck.

However I do know that the left is desperate for some right wing violence as a reason for a government crackdown. That means we’re winning as long as we keep the political pressure on.