[ArrogantBustard]

The headline is a flat-out lie.

He refused to grant a divorce to a pair of bulldykes who had pretended to contract a marriage in Vermont. Kansas law does not recognize these bulldykes as being spouses of each other. They aren’t married. Since they aren’t married, they can’t be divorced.

[ArrogantBustard]

Is this your blog?

Did you write that dishonest headline?

Did you excerpt your own blog?

I smell a blogpimp.

[guido911]

What a misleading and down right disingenuous crap title that is.

[chs68]

I'm NOT going to go to the link in your post.

Am I IBTZ?

I hope so!

[mamelukesabre]

Only homosexual divorce, If I understand it correctly.

[Sidebar Moderator]

ping...

[PapaBear3625]

Not just a blogpimp, not just a dishonest blogpimp, but a Lefty blogpimp

[shibumi]

[shibumi]

[50mm]

[50mm]

Admin Moderator declares lying article titles illegal on FR and modifies this one to attract kitties?

[shibumi]

So - Who were you in your previous life?

And what screen name will you use next time?

[Jet Jaguar]

FOR THOSE WHO WISH NOT TO VISIT THE BLOG, IT READS AS FOLLOWS:

A district judge in Otoe County, Nebraska has refused to divorce a couple — citing that he was never given that authority. It happens, in this specific situation, that the couple asking for the divorce were both women who gained legal marriage in Vermont.

The judge worked within the framework that, since Nebraska does not recognize their marriage, they cannot recognize a divorce either. So they are stuck, it seems, unless they move over to Iowa or back to Vermont or one of the other states that recognize such unions.

The single greatest threat to traditional marriage in the United States is divorce. Marriage is a union until death. Because marriage, by it’s nature, is indissoluble, no judge has the authority to grant a divorce. Their powers are limited to legal separation. And this homosexual couple is a good example of what happens when judges refuse divorce. Yes, child custody was handled, yes assets were divided — and yes, child support was decided upon.

Homosexual marriages aside (that is a topic for another day), there is no difference between a divorce and a separation – except that remarriage is not allowed. And what is so wrong with that?

Link:

[Viking2002]

RED ALERT! BLOG PIMP/POTENTIAL INCOMING ENEMY TROLL DETECTED! SET BEEBERS ON STUNE! ZOTTING WITH PREJUDICE HAS BEEN APPROVED! RED ALERT!

"But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: for men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away, for his name is Obama."

[death2tyrants]

We don't recognize gay marriage, you freak!

[Vendome]

 

[Vendome]

[bcsco]

They should have realized, what happens in Vermont stays in Vermont. So many of the people there are saps for socialist immorality Maybe it comes from over indulging in that tree sap... Nebraska is far more sensible. Thus, this obvious and proper decision.

But that doesn’t warrant a lying title to this vanity. A blog pimp is still a pimp. So that’s how you’ll be known here. It would be far more considerate if the Ad Mods simply put you out of your misery.

[houeto]

[CodeToad]

Fags can’t get divorced when they aren’t married. Your headline is a bullsh*t liberal lie. Go pimp your liberal trash blog elsewhere.