Posted on 02/27/2011 8:17:22 AM PST by freepersup
WASHINGTON – On Dec. 30, 2010, the day after Hollister v. Soetoro, challenging the constitutional eligibility of President Barack Obama, was docketed for the Jan. 14, 2011 conference of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), retired USAF Col. Gregory Hollister’s Attorney John Hemenway filed a motion for justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, both appointed by Obama, to recuse themselves.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Will the usurper's appointees recuse themselves THIS time?
source: http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-678.htm
source: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/lawyers-for-colonel-hollister-v-soetoro.html
past FR link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2650286/posts
past FR link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2648964/posts
Deconstructing Obotulism PING!
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-678.htm
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/lawyers-for-colonel-hollister-v-soetoro.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2650286/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2648964/posts
Deconstructing Obotulism PING!
one day closer.......
going.....going....goiiiiiingggg...
Don’t get too excited. The SCOTUS will kick this out just like every other eligibility case that has reached them. They are avoiding this issue like the plague.
Hemenway has been reprimanded by the Court for filing a frivolous lawsuit. Obotulism is spot on. Good one.
They’ve failed to recuse themselves in at least two other cases before the USSC involving the eligibility issue. This recusal is in the form of a motion. The clerk used the vernacular ‘request.’ Orwellian.
Justice Thomas (if true) was overheard remarking at a social gathering that he needs 4, meaning only 3 justices have agreed to move the issue forward.
I no longer have faith in the supreme court to do what is right. They were intimidated by the lefts continual attacks on them after making the right decision in the 2000 election.
Now, they don’t want anything to do with the presidency and constitutional issues surrounding who is holding that office.
Sadly, I believe you’re right. Something drastic in another branch of gov. would have to occur in relation to the issue (and that would be seen as opening the door) for the USSC to act.
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
This worries me....in some ways I am glad they will hear the case, but what if...the end result is...that they decide differently what a natural born citizen is....what if they say, dual nationality...this would open the flood gates for people, who hate America, to become President....
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
bump
Make certain they are reminded that it would be wonderful to have Nikki Haley or Bobby Jindal for president and see how they react.
As much as I hate to say this, kagen and sotomayor will not recuse themselves (unethically without a doubt), and again this will not get through conference.
Makes me sick...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.