If you looked at the link I posted... anyone with even the slightest observational abilities can see that more than one typewriter produced the “long form”. You are the one who is “ridiculous” and “pathetic”.
Considering the analog nature of the typewriter used, combined with artifacts that can be introduced by a modern image transfer, nothing in his analysis is the least bit surprising. The fact that he's even trying to do this kind of analysis on what is probably a copy of a copy is silly.