Posted on 08/31/2011 5:56:20 PM PDT by Neoavatara
Jonathan Alter has a well publicized piece on Bloomberg asking people opposing Barack Obama why he has been a bad president.
I know, I had to chuckle too.
Varied commentators have taken their stabs at answering the question. Classic non-conservative David Frum even took a swing at it. Mickey Kaus at The Daily Caller probably had the best answer.
But I thought I would take a swing at it too...especially in direct response to Alter's claims regarding the economy.
Obama's failure economically can be divided into two distinct parts: the stimulus, and everything after the stimulus.
1. The Stimulus Was A Failure
Only an extreme liberal could claim that the stimulus was a glowing success.
(Excerpt) Read more at neoavatara.com ...
Why didn’t you just post the whole article here? Nobody ever visits your site?
Is a pig’s butt pork?
Do bears poop in the woods?
Does the sun come up in the East?
Is this guy Catholic?
You know the Obama appologizers are out of arguments when they have to fall back on is “bad luck.”
Moron car insurance.
It’s beneath him.
He just visits us out of pity, spreading his pearls of wisdom like a cookie crumb trail back to his Bloggus Maximus.
Is this a trick question?
He’s been a bad fake president, does that count? :’) Thanks Neoavatara.
Follow the money.
Does Chatty Cathy have a plastic patootie?
Or calling us racists wanting to lynch people.
That is the moment I knew we were winning.
I find it funny to have anyone question whether Obama has been a failure. Of course he has. There is no question. Liberals are debating Obama’s success as being between bad and worse. There is nothing good in the Obama agenda to be proud of.
And go armed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.