Meh. As an attorney I find this entire issue pretty meaningless and remain utterly unconvinced of the “evidence”.
As an attorney you said then why do you say this as you must know as an attorney court is not meaningless.
Have you seen all the evidence too like you say you have?
Really n00b? As a self admitted attorney, I find you to have about a 98% likelyhood of being a...
Well, let me just say “John Edwards”.
Maybe. You still manage to make it to comment #4 on this thread that you think is on a meaningless topic.
I don’t know what to think. So, I appreciate Ms. Taitz’ efforts to clarify things.
have you looked at the photoshopped resume? on wnd.
the larger question is,
all presidential candidates should be vetted by the media.
obama was not.
we know more about sarah palin’s lipstick shades than we do about mr and mrs obama’s fake social security numbers.
I’m an attorney too and unlike you I find the evidence attention-getting and the legal issues fascinating. Some enterprisimg 2L on law review could really have some fun doing a thorough exploration of the standing problem. Maybe someone already has. I haven’t poked around in the journals lately. Maybe there’s a CLE that would cover it. Or not. But they are doing more out of the box stuff. Which is good, because I nearly fell asleep during my estates CLE. Just sayin...
noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooby
Sure n00b, whatever you say.
( crickets)
WElcome to FR what was your prior name, your response sounds very familiar...
******
You could be right, but I think that there will be a lot of voters come election day Nov. 2012 who will vote against Obama because of the way Obama has been so secretive about his background during the 2012 presidential campaign.
For instance, it has been nearly six months since Obama released his long form birth certificate to the public on April 27, yet Kapiolani Hospital has not said one word to verify that Obama was born there as it is stated on the long form birth certificate.
It would take a simple phone call from the President of the United States to Kapiolani officials---and put a deadly dagger into the heart of birther nation---for those officials to verify tomorrow that Obama was indeed born there, for those officials to allow reporters to examine Obama's records, and for the officials to point out the room where Obama's mother stayed in 1961, but Kapiolani and Obama are conspicuously silent. Why is that?
Could the answer be a simple one: Kapiolani officials are conspicuously silent because Obama was not born there as Obama claims, so there are no Obama records for anyone to look at, and there is no hospital room where Obama's mother stayed in 1961.
The obama administration has blatantly and repeatedly lied to your face about a Constitutional issue and that's meaningless and the evidence unconvincing?
Either you haven't taken the time to see the evidence or you're an obama supporter or you're suffering some other mental defect that interferes with your judgment.
Just curious, how much are they paying you for these posts?
Then you are of that part of the legal system which needs to be excised root and branch.
What specific ‘evidence’ have you seen and examined?
As an attorney you should be ashamed that a women immigrant cares more about the Constitution than you do.</Lawyers>