Because I didnt read the four page thing you sent me because you long ago got boring. You originally took issue with the idea that soft tissue surviving 65 million years was somehow surprising.
Newsflash: it is surprising.
Who cares if you are surprised? This not about you. This is about the topic of the thread and its author’s efforts to promote Creationism as the author sees it by holding evolutionary science up to ridicule upon the basis of the author’s comments about the dinosaur tissue.
If you want to be surprised, have at it. If you want to talk about the inability or ability of dinosaur tissue to survive in the observed condition for 65 or more million years, the let’s hear it.