Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sally Replies (AR-15 Question)
gunwatch.blogspot.com ^ | 6 April, 2013 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 04/05/2013 2:26:39 PM PDT by marktwain

Names changed to protect privacy

Thanks for all the info. I guess I had thought of this kind of rifle as belonging to gangs and not for sale to the general public. When George was in Viet Nam he shot a M16, which gave me the image that this kind of gun maybe should not be for the public.

But the way that you have discribed a use for this, gives it a different flavor. Probably would stop anyone in their tracks (just the sight of it). The knowledge that you have more shots seems almost impressive, if it would be needed. Not likely that a person would run out. Something to think about. Not a lot of kick. But tearing it down and cleaning would take some practice. Not impossible. From the stories I've heard the M16 could be taken apart and cleaned and put back together rather quickly. Not that everyone would be in a race.

Thank you for answering. I will keep your information. I appreciate it. Sally

Link to Sally's question and answer

©2013 by Dean Weingarten Permission to share granted as long as this notice is included.


TOPICS: Education; Military/Veterans; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: ar15; banglist; guncontrol; sally; secondamendment
There are millions of Sallys out there. If they learn the truth, we win.

It is our job to educate them.

1 posted on 04/05/2013 2:26:39 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“...When George was in Viet Nam he shot a M16...”

Hope he didn’t kill it....


2 posted on 04/05/2013 2:27:54 PM PDT by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Link to Sally’s question about why would a person have an AR-15:

http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2013/04/why-would-people-want-ar-15-question.html


3 posted on 04/05/2013 2:36:37 PM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

God Bless Sally.
I run into her often, too.
And I live in a military town!

The most important thing we can impart to the Sallies of the world is that we all have the Freedom to pursue and own whatever we want and can afford. It has nothing at all to do with need.

Disclaimer: No, I am not allowed to own a thermonuclear device. Nor would I want to. They’re a tremendous headache to keep up with!


4 posted on 04/05/2013 2:42:45 PM PDT by HiJinx (The New Year is here; to all Men Good Cheer. (Last one out, turn out the lights.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends




Support Free Republic.

Please Don't Delay!

5 posted on 04/05/2013 2:43:57 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx
Disclaimer: No, I am not allowed to own a thermonuclear device. Nor would I want to. They’re a tremendous headache to keep up with!

When someone throws that straw man into the argument I think the best thing to do is ask "We're talking about firearms aren't we? Nukes, shoulder-fired rockets and grenade launchers are not firearms. When the National RPG Association starts lobbying Congress for citizen-owned RPGs then we can discuss that. OK?"

6 posted on 04/05/2013 3:09:22 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

7 posted on 04/05/2013 3:28:21 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Good comeback.


8 posted on 04/05/2013 3:41:36 PM PDT by HiJinx (The New Year is here; to all Men Good Cheer. (Last one out, turn out the lights.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

They probably wouldn’t learn anything but at least they would shut up. ;^)


9 posted on 04/05/2013 3:55:34 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

k “We’re talking about firearms aren’t we? Nukes, shoulder-fired rockets and grenade launchers are not firearms.”

OK the nukes I’ll agree with, but shoulder fired rockets and grenade launchers are indeed “firearms” and should be legal for private citizens


10 posted on 04/05/2013 5:39:24 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Figment

Whether they should be legal to own or not is a fair argument but they are not in any way firearms. If you want to make the current gun control debate about RPGs and rockets go right ahead but be prepared to lose the entire argument in an overwhelming way allowing the libs to make strides they couldn’t otherwise achieve.


11 posted on 04/05/2013 5:50:08 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Figment
When asked what the limits of the 2nd Amendment should be with regards to what kind of weapons citizens should be allowed to own, I think it reasonable to look at the weapons that were in civilian hands at the time our founders wrote it and draw analogs.

The Pennsylvania and Kentucky rifles were analogous to today's AR-15 or AR-10, but our founders didn't draw the line there...during the Revolution, our government contracted privateers with schooners bristling with cannon capable of sinking or capturing enemy warships and shelling coastal towns into oblivion. The US government at the time had no problem with private citizens owning such weapon systems, and indeed, was happy their services were available to be had.

12 posted on 04/05/2013 6:11:55 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“Whether they should be legal to own or not is a fair argument but they are not in any way firearms.”

They aren’t? Explain the difference. I’m not saying make this a part of current arguments in legislation. I’m just saying they are firearms


13 posted on 04/05/2013 7:55:02 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Figment
firearms

Use Firearms in a sentence
fire·arm
[fahyuhr-ahrm] Show IPA

noun

a small arms weapon, as a rifle or pistol, from which a projectile is fired by gunpowder.

Origin:
1640–50; fire + arm2

World English Dictionary firearm (ˈfaɪərˌɑːm) [Click for IPA pronunciation guide]

— n

a weapon, esp a portable gun or pistol, from which a projectile can be discharged by an explosion caused by igniting gunpowder, etc

Obviously a rocket is self-propelled missile not a projectile discharged by an explosion contained within the firearm. The difference between a firearm and a rocket is very fundamental.

14 posted on 04/05/2013 10:57:29 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson