Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Blue Jays

They were probably both being aggressive verbally, looks like Colorado definitely assaulted first with the pepper spray. However, once he had him running away from him Benn should have let him go. On the other hand, hard to second guess a guy that was assaulted with a chemical agent. He might have had blurred vision, was in pain, afraid the guy would come around and get a drop on him. Unless there was some evidence otherwise I’d have a hard time voting to convict the guy.


3 posted on 02/17/2015 8:58:16 AM PST by rmichaelj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: rmichaelj

I kind of agree. You can’t pepper spray someone over a verbal altercation and being walked in front of doesn’t pass my threshold for a threat. Once attacked Benn was legally allowed to do what was necessary to stop the threat and were I on a jury I would consider the argument you present.

In a way this was a modern day duel in my opinion. Either man could have de-escalated this but both men wanted it, both men got it, and one ended up dead.


6 posted on 02/17/2015 9:25:52 AM PST by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rmichaelj

Some of us are allergic to pepper spray. If someone sprays me, I will shoot them in self defense as that spray is a threat to my life.


8 posted on 02/17/2015 10:15:56 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rmichaelj
One also must wonder if both men had current CCW credentials?
I believe the Second Amendment is sufficient yet courts might believe otherwise.

9 posted on 02/17/2015 2:20:02 PM PST by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson