To: 2ndDivisionVet
That’s more porn than anyone can handle!!
2 posted on
02/14/2016 6:26:50 PM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking but I know what I am thinking.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is called Dense Wave Division Multiplexing (DWDM) and it's already WIDELY in use. Most top out at 10gbs.
Everyone has been trying to multiplex more onto a single strand, but the distortions of long haul transmission make it impractical.
These guys have only proved what everyone already knew.
5 posted on
02/14/2016 6:36:04 PM PST by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
UCL sets new digital data speed record: 50,000 times faster than today's superfast internet Skynet is stirring.
6 posted on
02/14/2016 6:49:03 PM PST by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The problem is not moving data across the fiber. The current problem is moving it OFF the fiber.
7 posted on
02/14/2016 7:14:29 PM PST by
taxcontrol
( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
1.125 terabit per second is about 140 gigabytes per second. That’s pretty fast, but I bet the Internet connection on the Enterprise was even faster!
8 posted on
02/14/2016 7:26:04 PM PST by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; JosephW; Only1choice____Freedom; amigatec; ...
9 posted on
02/15/2016 3:50:59 AM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Now they need to invent a HD that can keep up with it ;^)
10 posted on
02/15/2016 4:29:16 AM PST by
Bikkuri
((...))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
