Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/24/2016 2:41:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

laser sail spacecraft is not a new idea...


2 posted on 03/24/2016 2:42:26 PM PDT by orionrising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m not all-in on the faster-than-light part.


3 posted on 03/24/2016 2:43:05 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The design is real but the author is a nitwit.


4 posted on 03/24/2016 2:43:58 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t see how he expects to go faster than light.


5 posted on 03/24/2016 2:44:21 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Cool idea but I’m thinking the G-forces might be a bit much. It is what 55 MILLION kilometers to Mars at a minimum.


6 posted on 03/24/2016 2:44:32 PM PDT by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Parking and checking in your luggage has always been the hardest part.


7 posted on 03/24/2016 2:45:11 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They just have to figure out how to slow it down and stop at the destination.


8 posted on 03/24/2016 2:46:38 PM PDT by CMB_polarization
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

OK, who wants to volunteer to man the wafer thin space craft traveling at 1/4th the speed of light to the planet Mars whish is about 33-249 million miles away from earth? anybody? Anyone?


11 posted on 03/24/2016 2:48:28 PM PDT by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Domino’s pizza deliver to Mars is now possible!


12 posted on 03/24/2016 2:48:33 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This time, however, he identified the use of high-powered lasers to propel wafer-thin spacecrafts to the Red Planet faster than the speed of light.

Nope.

14 posted on 03/24/2016 2:52:17 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is rabies. Anyone infected needs to be put down like a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

30 minutes? “Really snaps yer head back!”

Wouldn’t that involve a lot of g’s on both ends of the trip (accelerating and decelerating)?


16 posted on 03/24/2016 2:55:06 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (The would-be Empress has no clothes. My eyes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Salamander; JoeProBono
The new technology comes with a decidedly "retro" look -

The problem of deceleration will be handled by slowly circling the landing spot while the crew keeps a watchful eye out for really big lizards.


17 posted on 03/24/2016 2:56:23 PM PDT by shibumi (Vampire Outlaw of the Milky Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
he identified the use of high-powered lasers to propel wafer-thin spacecrafts to the Red Planet faster than the speed of light

This reminds me of something, but I can't quite put my finger on it.

18 posted on 03/24/2016 2:57:12 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
wafer-thin spacecrafts

So you would get a computer to the destination, but nothing else.

faster than the speed of light

No, just no. The author should have run the article by someone with a degree in physics. This is not a proposal to get to the destination faster than the speed of light. Physics (at present) has stated this is impossible. In addition, one could not use light to propel something faster than light. Once the object has reached light speed, there would be no momentum transfer from light to the object.

As an example, on the eventual upper end, a full-scale (50-70 GW) DE-STAR 4

While not a stupid concept, DE-STAR is just a proposal. Also a 50GW laser is huge.

This means that while space travel takes 30 minutes, it could equal a decade here on Earth.

The proposal is to fly an object from Earth to Mars in 30 minutes. Whatever relativistic time scale that is in, it would take less than 9 months on Earth as that is the current amount of time.
24 posted on 03/24/2016 3:00:23 PM PDT by ronnietherocket3 (Mary is understood by the heart, not study of scripture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Message reads: 'Houston, be advised: Phillip Lubin is a steely-eyed missile man.”
― Andy Weir, The Martian (edited)
27 posted on 03/24/2016 3:03:23 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to meand over an is worthless." - Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“As a proposed precursor to interstellar travel, Lubin's concept has been met with a bit of skepticism due to some perceived flaws. For example, there is the question about deceleration once the low-mass probe approaches Mars

What good does it do you to get to Mars in 30 minutes if you are going to just sail right on by?

Lasers may be able to accelerate you to 25% of the speed of light but there is no laser on Mars to slow you down and no rocket on the spacecraft is going to do the job.

28 posted on 03/24/2016 3:03:26 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
propel wafer-thin spacecrafts to the Red Planet faster than the speed of light...

Discredits the entire article. Either the UC physics professor doesn't know what he's talking about (not likely), or the author doesn't, and nothing he says can be trusted.

29 posted on 03/24/2016 3:03:27 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“propel wafer-thin spacecrafts to the Red Planet faster than the speed of light.”

Aaaaand, sane people stop reading right there.


39 posted on 03/24/2016 3:21:34 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ("Get the he11 out of my way!" - John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Faster than light speed?

From a real physicist?

Sounds more like something from a Climate Change “scientist” to me.

However, methinks the reporter may have pulled a Hillary or two....after all, both reporters and the Hillbeast are of equivalent technical intelligence.


46 posted on 03/24/2016 3:26:10 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I wish I could be around another hundred years. when I hear about scientific speculation like this because I know that the benefits of this wont be there for another hundred years.


47 posted on 03/24/2016 3:27:22 PM PDT by PCPOET7 ( TH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson