Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
laser sail spacecraft is not a new idea...
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’m not all-in on the faster-than-light part.
3 posted on
03/24/2016 2:43:05 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The design is real but the author is a nitwit.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I don’t see how he expects to go faster than light.
5 posted on
03/24/2016 2:44:21 PM PDT by
dinodino
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Cool idea but I’m thinking the G-forces might be a bit much. It is what 55 MILLION kilometers to Mars at a minimum.
6 posted on
03/24/2016 2:44:32 PM PDT by
taxcontrol
( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Parking and checking in your luggage has always been the hardest part.
7 posted on
03/24/2016 2:45:11 PM PDT by
ThomasThomas
(Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
They just have to figure out how to slow it down and stop at the destination.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
OK, who wants to volunteer to man the wafer thin space craft traveling at 1/4th the speed of light to the planet Mars whish is about 33-249 million miles away from earth? anybody? Anyone?
11 posted on
03/24/2016 2:48:28 PM PDT by
RC one
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Domino’s pizza deliver to Mars is now possible!
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This time, however, he identified the use of high-powered lasers to propel wafer-thin spacecrafts to the Red Planet faster than the speed of light.Nope.
14 posted on
03/24/2016 2:52:17 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Islam is rabies. Anyone infected needs to be put down like a dog.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
30 minutes? “Really snaps yer head back!”
Wouldn’t that involve a lot of g’s on both ends of the trip (accelerating and decelerating)?
16 posted on
03/24/2016 2:55:06 PM PDT by
Pearls Before Swine
(The would-be Empress has no clothes. My eyes!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; Salamander; JoeProBono
The new technology comes with a decidedly "retro" look -
The problem of deceleration will be handled by slowly circling the landing spot while the crew keeps a watchful eye out for really big lizards.
17 posted on
03/24/2016 2:56:23 PM PDT by
shibumi
(Vampire Outlaw of the Milky Way)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
To: 2ndDivisionVet
wafer-thin spacecrafts
So you would get a computer to the destination, but nothing else.
faster than the speed of light
No, just no. The author should have run the article by someone with a degree in physics. This is not a proposal to get to the destination faster than the speed of light. Physics (at present) has stated this is impossible. In addition, one could not use light to propel something faster than light. Once the object has reached light speed, there would be no momentum transfer from light to the object.
As an example, on the eventual upper end, a full-scale (50-70 GW) DE-STAR 4
While not a stupid concept, DE-STAR is just a proposal. Also a 50GW laser is huge.
This means that while space travel takes 30 minutes, it could equal a decade here on Earth.
The proposal is to fly an object from Earth to Mars in 30 minutes. Whatever relativistic time scale that is in, it would take less than 9 months on Earth as that is the current amount of time.
24 posted on
03/24/2016 3:00:23 PM PDT by
ronnietherocket3
(Mary is understood by the heart, not study of scripture.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Message reads: 'Houston, be advised: Phillip Lubin is a steely-eyed missile man.
― Andy Weir, The Martian (edited)
27 posted on
03/24/2016 3:03:23 PM PDT by
Pollster1
("A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to meand over an is worthless." - Scalia)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
As a proposed precursor to interstellar travel, Lubin's concept has been met with a bit of skepticism due to some perceived flaws. For example, there is the question about deceleration once the low-mass probe approaches Mars What good does it do you to get to Mars in 30 minutes if you are going to just sail right on by?
Lasers may be able to accelerate you to 25% of the speed of light but there is no laser on Mars to slow you down and no rocket on the spacecraft is going to do the job.
28 posted on
03/24/2016 3:03:26 PM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
propel wafer-thin spacecrafts to the Red Planet faster than the speed of light...
Discredits the entire article. Either the UC physics professor doesn't know what he's talking about (not likely), or the author doesn't, and nothing he says can be trusted.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“propel wafer-thin spacecrafts to the Red Planet faster than the speed of light.”
Aaaaand, sane people stop reading right there.
39 posted on
03/24/2016 3:21:34 PM PDT by
ctdonath2
("Get the he11 out of my way!" - John Galt)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Faster than light speed?
From a real physicist?
Sounds more like something from a Climate Change “scientist” to me.
However, methinks the reporter may have pulled a Hillary or two....after all, both reporters and the Hillbeast are of equivalent technical intelligence.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I wish I could be around another hundred years. when I hear about scientific speculation like this because I know that the benefits of this wont be there for another hundred years.
47 posted on
03/24/2016 3:27:22 PM PDT by
PCPOET7
( TH)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson