Anything puked out by the MSM is manufactured bunk.
Seems like this algorithm must be similar to Amazon’s predictive stocking of inventory at their regional distribution centers or the sidebar advertisements on the internet. I wonder what the data shows for political bling purchases?
A data mining expert who doesn't understand what "orders of magnitude means"? I wouldn't trust this guy to do my laundry.
A magnitude of order is 10 times. so Trump is going to win 90% to 9%?
Hmmmmm........
Which “blue states” is Trump going to win?
It would be interesting to compare any videos of Obama vs Romney. If you could count the viewership up until the election day of 2012 - I don’t know if data that specific is available. But that would compare the viewership numbers against the actual voting results.
Even though I believe Trump will win I trust Cliff High and his wed bot bunk as much as I trust Nostradamus.
Just beat out the voter fraud and Trump wins.
For well over a year, I have been predicting here on FR a Trump 65%, Clanky 27% massive tsunami mandate blowout by The Donald.
Nice to finally see someone other than me has the gift of "second sight."
I don’t know about this guy, he seems to have a problem with some mathematical concepts or he speaks in wild hyperbole, I don’t know which. But I posted this on another thread and I think it holds here:
Polling has transitioned from its original intention of being a snapshot of the “horse race” aspect of political campaigns - a newsy barometer - to becoming a campaign tactic.
The Hillary campaign has been fakery from the very beginning - their entire strategy from before the primaries was fakery. They wanted to create the meme of the “inevitable”. This would depress and discourage their opposition, whether Bernie (which was fakery even beyond this) to the Republican opponent (which they miscalculated significantly). The omnipresent polls have been a major part of their campaign tactics from the Convention on...and are just as fake as the rest of their smoke and mirrors campaign strategy has been. They have paid good Soros money to make damned sure they controlled the narrative from the polling even more than they controlled questions and moderators at the debates. This IS their strategy, has been from the beginning. Just takes willing accomplices and money and Voila! the polls say what you want them to.
These late polls are just as fake as the others throughout the campaign have been. We are being played by a tactic that fits into their overall strategy.
Trump will win by 7, perhaps more. And nothing in the past 10 days has changed anything except the “perhaps more” part.
Not a good analysis. Democrats don’t read... too high.
I think his orders of magnitude is in levels of interest. And, the votes are spread over the country, not in specific states. He also inclined that the ‘Deep State’ counts the votes and rigs the polls to influence the votes. Reading between the lines, it seems that Trumps wins the votes but maybe not the election. Maybe I didn’t hear him correctly.
Measuring YouTube views is not the same thing as measuring votes. There are plenty of reasons people would watch Trump videos apart from wanting to vote for him. Just as there are reasons Clinton voters wouldn’t be motivated to watch her videos. And that’s just the minority of people that watch any of them.
The difference is that Trump has enthusiastic supporters who enjoy listening to him. Even Hillary’s husband won’t listen to her, and he is praying she’ll win so he can play with interns again. You cannot draw the usual conclusions from this year’s data mining.