Posted on 11/03/2016 7:11:32 AM PDT by ResisTyr
Internet data mining expert Clif High says the naked data on the Internet shows Trump winning the 2016 Presidential election by a landslide. High explains, You can do a search on YouTube that brings back a list of primary speeches by both candidates. I am not talking about Fred Smiths copy of a video he made of Trump. I am talking about a speech took officially of Trump, and they released it officially. If you take just those, you can see youve got Hillary Clinton on one side with 2,165 views, and Trump on the other side with 775,653 views. So, that is not anecdotal. This is a very crude level of statistical analysis, but it is nonetheless statistical analysis, and it is very pointed because it is extremely self-selecting. There is nobody watching you when you choose to watch something on YouTube. So, there is no peer pressure or external person polling you. . . . Its what I call a very naked data set because there is no pressure on an emotional level on people.
(Excerpt) Read more at usawatchdog.com ...
Yeah, poor choice of words at best.
Trump only racks up 40 million votes??? What am I missing here? O’wise, severe ROTFLMAO kicks in...
Is this REAL??
Is this REAL??
Uh oh. Call the whole thing off.
If this is correct, it will justify rounding up and eliminating, as a species, all registered democrats...
Which is why I think it's BS. The Cubs winning the World Series, AND the liquidation of the Left, in the same month? I've never been that lucky.
California.
Yup. Lotsa people getting their panties in a twist over this. Relax,and take it as entertainment the way we do with Carl Rove and Slick’s former campaign manager.
Even using the electoral college vote, you can’t cut him enough slack to use “orders of magnitude” since even the singular 1 order of magnitude is 10 times as large (and he uses the plural).
In the electoral college of 538 votes that is 489 to 49, which means Trump even carries the illegal alien Mecca of California. IMPOSSIBLE!
California has 55 electoral college votes.
Have you not been paying attention?
He is ahead in Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan , and Va. He is tied and gaining in Pennsylvania and Colorado
Just beat out the voter fraud and Trump wins.
Remember this one:
It could happen.
For well over a year, I have been predicting here on FR a Trump 65%, Clanky 27% massive tsunami mandate blowout by The Donald.
Nice to finally see someone other than me has the gift of "second sight."
If real, you need to post this profusely to get the word out.
Easy to compare numbers on Tuesday night. Wouldn’t be surprised if they change this to look more legitimate, but still have Hillary win.
Tin Foil Time is upon us.
Yeah, let’s pick apart his “wording” and ignore the actual fantastic “message.” What a mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging tool. You’d make a great Democrat.
I don’t know about this guy, he seems to have a problem with some mathematical concepts or he speaks in wild hyperbole, I don’t know which. But I posted this on another thread and I think it holds here:
Polling has transitioned from its original intention of being a snapshot of the horse race aspect of political campaigns - a newsy barometer - to becoming a campaign tactic.
The Hillary campaign has been fakery from the very beginning - their entire strategy from before the primaries was fakery. They wanted to create the meme of the inevitable. This would depress and discourage their opposition, whether Bernie (which was fakery even beyond this) to the Republican opponent (which they miscalculated significantly). The omnipresent polls have been a major part of their campaign tactics from the Convention on...and are just as fake as the rest of their smoke and mirrors campaign strategy has been. They have paid good Soros money to make damned sure they controlled the narrative from the polling even more than they controlled questions and moderators at the debates. This IS their strategy, has been from the beginning. Just takes willing accomplices and money and Voila! the polls say what you want them to.
These late polls are just as fake as the others throughout the campaign have been. We are being played by a tactic that fits into their overall strategy.
Trump will win by 7, perhaps more. And nothing in the past 10 days has changed anything except the perhaps more part.
Words have meanings— in science very precise meanings, so if someone purports to be a scientific expert then their credibility will be judged on how clearly they communicate their findings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.