[FreedomStar3028]

I highly doubt they advocated pedophilia(which is an attraction to pre-pubescent children).

Having an attraction to post pubescent teenagers (15-20) is not pedophilia. It’s actually quite normal for men to be attracted to any woman that is developed regardless of if they are 18 or not.

If they did advocate sex with children between the ages of 1-12 then I would say they are some sick buggers. But I doubt it.

[kara37]

Having an attraction to post pubescent teenagers (15-20) is not pedophilia.

****************************************

Umm, big difference between 15 and 20. The fact that you put them in the same category is disturbing.

[ealgeone]

Having an attraction to post pubescent teenagers (15-20) is not pedophilia. It’s actually quite normal for men to be attracted to any woman that is developed regardless of if they are 18 or not.

If anyone thinks its ok to have sex with an underage girl (18) when they're a grown man then they don't belong on this forum and they are not a conservative.

[mumblypeg]

The Salon article referenced here, which was removed, was indeed written by an avowed pedophile named Nickerson who went on and on about his obsessive thoughts of having sex with prepubescent children, but he can’t help it so don’t judge him.

There could be a “Milo effect” at work here, for which even Milo’s detractors may end up being grateful: namely, a lot of perverts may run, not walk, back into their closets.