This is not the first time I’ve been attacked on FR, so I presume the best you can do is defend your “firm” with histrionics and slurs.
Alrighty then.
Question: Since I openly-stated my position in the initial comment, i must conclude that your demand for proof means that you have no defense or perhaps dont understand my prior question.
So ill put it in language a 4 year-old can understand:
Without “proof” that your firm isn’t biased in its research, you have admitted that my premise is correct: Lack of proof that a cytoxic compound is not dangerous does not prove it safe. After years of defending it, they must have removed it for economic reasons then, huh? /s
Thank you for reinforcing my point.
Ps...i never wrote that thimerosal causes autism.
Reading comprehension is a skill that takes effort.
First, children in America are living at the highest levels of health they ever have.
Secondly, when one removes socio-ethnic groups where children are considered an inconvenience rather than a blessing, our children’s health, in fact our entire population’s health, is in the top 2% of the world’s countries.
Third, thimerosal was removed from some vaccine sealants for the simple reason that the Ludite lunatic fringe was promoting irrational fear, as they often do. All too often this leads to toxic torts, ridiculous class-action litigation, with no scientific basis, that still costs tens of millions of dollars to defend. A classic example is the recent case against Subway because some of the bread in their foot-long subs did not rise enough, causing 11 inch sandwiches. The lawyers were about to get $525,000 to settle the matter, until a smart judge realized the case had no merit.
Finally, If you think anyone who is simply asking you to backup statements and assumptions with some facts is attacking you, then perhaps it is time for you to use some of the benefits available in our healthcare system for those similarly delusional.