To: 2ndDivisionVet
Wish we’d built mag lev trains here.
2 posted on
10/03/2017 10:19:06 PM PDT by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Yep, it's a cool idea. Which is why Heinlein used it almost 65 years ago.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
SpaceX's BFR will be much more economical than current rockets, so much so that any other radical idea would not be able to get funding. this was already the fate of one promising project that I know of.
BFR
To: 2ndDivisionVet
First off, to propel spacecraft to necessary speeds, a massive amount of power will need to be stored and discharged over roughly thirty seconds, think between 50 and 100 gigawatts! That's equivalent to the power output of around 50,000 commercial wind turbines. Or 50 to 100 full size nuclear power plants.
That is a lot of power.
And I cant imagine the size of the capacitor banks that it would need to store that power for quick release at around 200 million amperes!
I cant imagine the noise that it would make when those capacitors were discharged
5 posted on
10/03/2017 10:35:02 PM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
an 81 MILE vacuum tube filled with track, magnets and superconducting electrical cables, powered by dozens of nuclear plants (!)
but wait! it's built on the side of a mountain!
10 posted on
10/03/2017 11:35:40 PM PDT by
867V309
(Lock Her Up)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
16 posted on
10/04/2017 4:47:47 AM PDT by
sauropod
(I am His and He is Mine)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
18 posted on
10/04/2017 6:28:31 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=800>)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“A generation-1 StarTram design intended to launch cargo vessels will feature a 81-mile tube built up the side of a mountain to reach a launch altitude of 12,0000 to 20,000 feet. The Andes Mountains of Chile or the White Sands Missile Range of southern New Mexico might be ideal locations.”
An 81 mile underground tube = financially impractical.
Cost, cost, cost is ALWAYS a consideration and cannot be dismissed just because the idea sounds “neat”. Witness the Concorde supersonic airliner. Cool idea, financially impractical.
21 posted on
10/04/2017 6:52:23 AM PDT by
Wuli
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Craft will exit the lengthy tube at a speed of 8.8 kilometers per secondFor a projected 81 mile trip, the trip/launch would take about 20 seconds.
No human could survive that kind of acceleration.
22 posted on
10/04/2017 6:55:58 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
("Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment." - Will Rogers)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The answer to headlines that
pose a question is usually “no.”
27 posted on
10/04/2017 2:27:48 PM PDT by
sparklite2
(I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Read the same about railguns years ago.
29 posted on
10/04/2017 7:48:58 PM PDT by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson