Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microstamping case headed for California Supreme court argument
guns.com ^ | March 13, 2018 | Chris Eger

Posted on 03/14/2018 7:20:30 AM PDT by PROCON

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: PROCON

Police your brass! haha

And police someone else’s for easy framing.


21 posted on 03/14/2018 8:14:47 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

This law is doing exactly what it was intended to do. Cut off the supply of semi auto pistols.


22 posted on 03/14/2018 8:46:16 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
...where the police find the gun on the person who shot a person. They are the vast majority of murders. This whole “stealing a gun” to shoot someone is very rare unless it is a family member and the gun is in the house.

You have been watching too much TV. The vast majority of murders are never solved.

I can't find the current % of stolen guns used in murders but I did find a statistic from 1991:

"...According to the 1991 Survey of State Prison Inmates, among those inmates who possessed a handgun, 9% had acquired it through theft, and 28% had acquired it through an illegal market such as a drug dealer or fence..."

If we just take this at face value, in at least 37% of times where we find a criminal with a gun, tracing the gun would lead us to the wrong person. Now this is not the same as finding cartridge cases and tracing the gun from there, which I suspect would be even worse.

But, the real bottom line is that if we find the gun on the criminal and we have the cartridge cases, we can already match them up by forensic examination.

What this law does is point police to the wrong person in more than 1/3 of all instances.

23 posted on 03/14/2018 9:36:06 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Not impossible, but micro stamping is not the magic bullet (pun intended) that the left makes it out to be.


24 posted on 03/14/2018 10:11:38 AM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

use a Colt ARMY 1860. .44, no ballistics on a smashed lead ball, no brass.


25 posted on 03/14/2018 10:36:39 AM PDT by bravo whiskey (Never bring a liberal gun law to a gun fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Most shootings are with stolen guns. How would this help?


26 posted on 03/14/2018 10:50:32 AM PDT by CodeToad (Dr. Spock was an idiot!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
Rumor has it that the only reason Glock still manufacturers Generation 3 handguns is for the California market, where they are grandfathered onto the Roster of Certified Handguns.

The newer Gen 4 and Gen 5 pistols can only be sold to law enforcement in Kalifornia. Opening up the roster again to new pistols will end that nonsense.

27 posted on 03/14/2018 10:54:14 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77
Remove the firing pin, run it over a sharpening stone, no more micro-stamping.

Maryland did not use micro-stamping. It required a fired case from each handgun to be sent to the State Police to be imaged and put into a database. The idea was that ejection markings could be used to identify the gun. In the years they had the program, they had one match.

Soon enough the State stopped scanning the cases. They just threw them all into 55 gallon drums. Finally, the regulation was repealed.

28 posted on 03/14/2018 11:02:54 AM PDT by IndispensableDestiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

My guess is that in “The land of the fruits and nuts” they know it is impossible but will pass or have passed a law which says that no gun can be sold or owned in California unless it has such capability.


29 posted on 03/14/2018 11:58:07 AM PDT by Nuocmam (Loose lips sink ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
And don't forget Fire Lapping
30 posted on 03/14/2018 1:26:28 PM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson