Posted on 03/31/2018 6:27:49 AM PDT by DWW1990
Ignore the 2nd amendment and you will have a revolution. Just ask King Charles.
When I left my parents home 40 years ago I wasn’t looking for government care and I won’t be looking for or accepting any for the rest of my life.
That attitude is sorely missing across the U.S. today.
It’s silly to think that any significant number of states would ratify such an Amendment.
And enforcement? Forget about it. It would be a bloodbath and the government would give up quicker than We The people would give up.
Likewise.
Never taken nor will take the government dime.
I’m ok with the government dime being there for the TRULY needy, but that’s like 3% of the people who take it.
Liberals want to repeal the 1st amendment too. They want to control information and the public discourse with an iron hand, or fist if they have power.
Im ok with the government dime being there for the TRULY needy, but thats like 3% of the people who take it.
Absolutely agree 100%.
Yeah, it’s a pipe dream, and like the author noted, not really necessary for devoted leftists.
Liberals want power, pure and simple. Whatever stands in their way of that is a target.
Because their ignoring it does not stop the sale. By repealing it they could stop the sale of guns, and more importantly the sale of ammunition, or any product that could be used to create ammunition.
Thomas Jefferson: And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms The tree of Liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
1. Separation of Church and State;
and
2. The unfettered right to an abortion.
Neither of which are even in the Constitution. So in other words you are saying that they do not believe in the Constitution at all, and I must agree. 8>)
>
When I left my parents home 40 years ago I wasnt looking for government care and I wont be looking for or accepting any for the rest of my life.
>
IMO, the issue isn’t *you* were(n’t) looking (Lord knows ther are plenty that do/are). The issue is they SHOULDN’T BE THERE.
Excellent point!
Strange how the liberals had 8 years under Obama to change the law and didn’t and now expect someone else to do it so they can pass the blame on them for the deadly outcome.
3. The right of Larry anf Harry to pretend to marry.
>
Im ok with the government dime being there for the TRULY needy, but thats like 3% of the people who take it.
Absolutely agree 100%.
>
Disagree. Govt has neither the ability, nor capacity to 1) determine ‘need’ 2) bestow ‘charity’.
For EVERYTHING govt ‘has’ is a product of the work of another. What govt bestows it has taken from someone else.
YOU, or a group, wish to write a check, give voluntarily....have at it.
But there is *NOTHING* by govt that doesn’t come from being TAKEN by POWER\point of a gun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.