BREAKING NEWS: MEDIA OUTLETS IN UK NOW CAN PUBLISH COURT INFORMATION ON TOMMY ROBINSON
The contempt of court sentence is based on the idea that Tommy Robinson published information that could prejudice a trial.
That is all for now.........
Posted on 05/29/2018 5:53:50 AM PDT by Nextrush
Journalists in the UK reportedly challenged the publication ban and can now report on what happened in court in Leeds last Friday.
Stories are now appearing online.
Contempt of court is cited as the reason Robinson was given a 13 month sentence..........
(Excerpt) Read more at nextrushfree.blogspot.com ...
Mighty big of the government there...
>>The contempt of court sentence is based on the idea that Tommy Robinson published information that could prejudice a trial.
He was streaming footage from outside the courthouse.
Was it something he particularly said that would prejudice the trial? Or merely covering it as an observer on the street?
Should the block be closed off so that no one accidentally sees the courthouse during the trial?
Were the jurors watching he stream?
I don’t know much about his history, I’d have figured the contempt of court charge was based on a previous agreement with the court (as when people are prohibited from using facebook, etc.).
A link would be nice.
Google search...’lifted gag order tommy robinson’
comes up empty
If Tommy survives prison, he can produce a good-reading book while inside.
What stopped you from posting the whole thing?
The more I find out about this case and, more importantly these grooming gangs the more disturbed I am.
If Tommy survives prison, he can produce a good-reading book while inside.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pilgrim%27s_Progress
A classic written in prison........................
Contempt of court is cited as the reason Robinson was given a 13 month sentence..........
Courts sometimes earn their contempt. The whole point of Joe Average serving on a jury and being responsible for determining guilt or innocence and in some cases nullifying a charge based on the jurors own sense of justice, is to prevent courts and governments from running roughshod over the public.
That a UK court would put someone in jail for a year, no trial, no jury, and then demand the public shut up is a sign of a government that is corrupt and unaccountable.
Apparently the police and local government officials have ALSO been partaking of these ‘grooming’ (ie, gang rape) scenarios along with the imported offenders.
Wonder if this particular judge has as well.
It certainly seems that the importees over there have ‘something’ hanging over the law enforcement and politicians that renders them (the importees) kevlar and teflon.
First I’ve heard of Tommy Robinson.
Now that the Stalinist bully boy tactics backfired and ignited widespread condemnation from across the Western world.........
Courts sometimes earn their contempt.
Now imagine. Tommy is watching all this from his tanning salon next door.
Tommy could not have prejudiced the trial because it was over and the perps were found guilty. They were appearing for a sentencing hearing. Small wonder they even showed up. This could as easily have been NYC, Baltimore, Chicago, DC, or Los Angeles. Until anticultural communism is rooted out, branch and root, we will not be able to survive the Muslim hoard.
Psst... This was all foretold in the Bible. We even know how it ends.
Redditors putting it all together now:
Looks like pizzagate might actually be a real thing.
wonder how many kiddos in the UK have gone into the social services system and ‘run away’ (ie, disappeared to the local kebab stand as the main course there literally) or been shipped off to the sandboxes as ‘brides’ or slaves?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5782667/EDL-founder-Tommy-Robinson-jailed-13-months.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.