Thought the answer to the headline was “ a pointy stick”
It is easy to get into the mindset of the gun grabbers.
Watch Schindler’s List.
A person who has chosen to be unarmed a naive idiot who actually believes the world is all unicorns and flowers.
I do not carry a pistol so I can impose my will on someone else.
I carry a pistol so someone else cannot impose their will on me.
Lynn Givens
Why in the world would I want to “get inside the mind” of a libtard? Seriously. The LAST place I would ever want to find myself. Personally, I am a short step from demonstrating my position on the issue by threatening to shoot them. Maybe that will convince them of the idiocy of their arguments. If threatening to shoot them demonstrates the foolishness of their position it might actually be a good idea as distasteful as I personally find it.
What is “gun culture”?
Perhaps, Mr Weingarten, YOU retain that willingness...alas, I do not.
Trying to talk with these people and present a coherent, reasonable argument, when the person is totally incoherent, unreasonable, vulgar, nasty, violent and just plain damned stupid...well, it ain't my cup o' tea no more.
I will simply ignore them and continue on with my life.
If, by far flung chance the blooming idiots succeed in further infringing on my rights, then I shall simply become an outlaw.
I want no discourse with the moon-bat dummies.
Well done, Sir.
I just want them to not drip stupidity drool near Me or My Family. I’m too Old, Grumpy, Hurt and Sick of them to put up with them anymore.
They are violent, espouse violent fantasies and wish to commit violence against those that are different or with whom they disagree.
Therefore, the "others" must be much, much worse...
It’s called, “my country would never commit such attrocities”. Which is funny since such people talk out both sides and consider Trump the greatest evil next to Satan.
I don’t have time to read this right now, but drive through the hoods in virtually any large Eastern city and look at the people...like it or not, they are SCARY. And you know what’s more scary, the thought that they may have guns.
Many people are terrified and still have to interact with these people, such as on subways/buses, etc. It affects them and I’m convinced that’s a major factor in their gun control position...along with not being able to imagine our government degenerating to the level of the UK, for example, where people are jailed for confronting attackers during a home invasion, or jailed for trying to report on a trial that the government demands be blacked out from coverage.
Crime is not rampant because we do not have enough prisons, because judges and prosecutors are too soft, because the police are hamstrung with absurd technicalities. The defect is there, in our character. We are a nation of cowards and shirkers.
Is your life worth protecting? If so, whose responsibility is it to protect it? If you believe that it is the police's, not only are you wrong -- since the courts universally rule that they have no legal obligation to do so -- but you face some difficult moral quandaries. How can you rightfully ask another human being to risk his life to protect yours, when you will assume no responsibility yourself?
One who values his life and takes seriously his responsibilities to his family and community will possess and cultivate the means of fighting back, and will retaliate when threatened with death or grievous injury to himself or a loved one....Let's not mince words: He will be armed, will be trained in the use of his weapon, and will defend himself when faced with lethal violence.
The liberal elite know that they are philosopher-kings. They know that the people simply cannot be trusted; that they are incapable of just and fair self-government; that left to their own devices, their society will be racist, sexist, homophobic, and inequitable -- and the liberal elite know how to fix things. They are going to help us live the good and just life, even if they have to lie to us and force us to do it. And they detest those who stand in their way.
The private ownership of firearms is a rebuke to this utopian zeal. To own firearms is to affirm that freedom and liberty are not gifts from the state. It is to reserve final judgment about whether the state is encroaching on freedom and liberty, to stand ready to defend that freedom with more than mere words, and to stand outside the state's totalitarian reach.
Thus, talking to antigunners who view gun control as part of a liberal Sharia Law is largely futile.
We need to negotiate the same way. First “demand”...all persons must carry a firearm. They want complete disarmament. We ask for complete armament. Discussion ends there.
Forcibly Disarmed...
The British didn’t think it thru either.
Facts, reason and logic are wasted on those who have conflated a learned helplessness with a completely unearned and unwarranted sense of moral superiority.
You cannot reason with them. You cannot bargain with them. You can only defeat them (hopefully at the ballot box) or be defeated by them. There is no middle ground and there is nothing that you compromise with them about. They want to take something of yours - your God given right to self defense - and give nothing in return.
And lest anyone think that once we've been disarmed that will be the end of it, look to other countries where citizens were disarmed. Look at the madness of Britain where reporting on criminal activities of Muslims gets you thrown in jail* or defending your property from robbers will also get you jailed**, Australia where they are doing away with cash transactions (to better track the activities of their serfs), Nazi Germany, PolPot's Cambodia, early 20th century Turkey, etc
** Tony Martin Who was almost not granted parole because one of the parole board members was worried the Martin "represented a danger to burglars"
Someone who wants a disarmed society doesn’t have a mind.
There is freedom and the illusion of freedom. Only free people own guns.