Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump preparing ORDER that will end ‘birthright citizenship’ — but can he do it?
The National Sentinel ^ | 10/30/18 | USA Features

Posted on 10/30/2018 5:20:54 AM PDT by SleeperCatcher

Executive Action: POTUS Donald Trump may be setting himself up for a huge constitutional battle if reports that he’s preparing to issue an executive order ending birthright citizenship are accurate.

Axios reported exclusively:

President Trump plans to sign an executive order that would remove the right to citizenship for babies of non-citizens and unauthorized immigrants born on U.S. soil, he said yesterday in an exclusive interview for “Axios on HBO,” a new four-part documentary news series debuting on HBO this Sunday at 6:30 p.m. ET/PT.

The order would be one of the most dramatic moves yet by the president as his immigration reform agenda continues to be thwarted by Democrats in Congress and far too many RINOs, though that could all change in less than two weeks of a legitimate red wave sweeps the midterm elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenationalsentinel.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 14thamendment; 4ththread; aliens; citizenship; constitution; executiveorder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: stanne
He can do anything he wants. He’s the chief of police.

Roy Scheider?

21 posted on 10/30/2018 5:35:12 AM PDT by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

With very good reason!


22 posted on 10/30/2018 5:35:17 AM PDT by Howie66 ("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
He knows all of his attempts to secure our sovereignty will be challenged. That's why he's been working so hard behind the scenes to dot the legal i's and cross the t's on this invasion that's in progress.

One more SCOTUS pick will make a LOT of common sense/Constitutional things more possible. MIght be able to do it with the two he already has but we can pray for at least one and maybe even 2 more before his 8 years are up...can even fantasize about 3 more.....

23 posted on 10/30/2018 5:35:34 AM PDT by trebb (Those who don't donate anything tend to be empty gasbags...no-value-added types)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

Not sure how this will pass judicial muster without a change to the 14th Amendment.


24 posted on 10/30/2018 5:36:33 AM PDT by ScottinVA (GOP: The party of jobs. Democrats: The party of mobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

“I think he is mind-screwing the left again.”

It’s so very easy to do!


25 posted on 10/30/2018 5:38:04 AM PDT by Howie66 ("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: oldasrocks

>>The 14th should not apply to people in the U.S. illegally.<<

That might be the point — clarify it. Given the SCOTUS makeup it might fly.

If it flies, President Trump will go down as the greatest President since Lincoln (maybe since Washington).


26 posted on 10/30/2018 5:39:07 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Always believe women except: clinton rape, ellison assault, booker groping, ted kennedy murder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

The Constitution can’t be changed with an EO.


27 posted on 10/30/2018 5:40:03 AM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
I would rather he waited until Ginsberg was replaced

Ginsberg will be rolled in on a hospital bed on life support as long as President Trump is in office. Granted, the Supremes are unpredictable, but this might be the best shot. I'm not convinced that the DC Sewer won't corrupt the two new judges, like it does everyone else. Anything President Trump waits on just gives his enemies time to gin up their storm troopers, especially ANTIFA for this one.

Waiting and announcing ahead of time hardly ever works out well. Can we really be sure it would in this case?

28 posted on 10/30/2018 5:40:25 AM PDT by grania ("You don't give power to an angry left wing mob")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
After all the 14th amendment explicitly states

And the 2nd explicitly states "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed", but plenty seem to think that's open to interpretation.

I'll just be happy to see the term "Anchor Babies" being discussed in the news. The left has hidden that element of the illegal invasion for far too long.

29 posted on 10/30/2018 5:41:03 AM PDT by grobdriver (BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: Larry Lucido
Don’t go to this blog! Autoplay videos, warning popups and general mayhem ensue!

I got NONE of that. I have Firefox and use "uBlock Origin". Also "Cookie AutoDelete".

31 posted on 10/30/2018 5:45:44 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Kill-googl,TWITR,FACBK,NYT,WaPo,Hlywd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antifa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

The plain meaning of the 14th Amendment means that one must BOTH be born in United States AND be subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

This excludes illegal immigrants who are in defiance of U.S. jurisdiction and are citizens of a foreign power.

Steve King’s website.


32 posted on 10/30/2018 5:48:08 AM PDT by BushCountry (thinks he needs a gal whose name doesn't end in ".jpg")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

Birthright citizenship was decided by a court. The 14th was written to apply to former slaves and their progeny to overcome the hold democrats still had in the process. An XO can clarify the rules to be applied and besides, no slaves in the U.S. anymore except we, the citizen taxpayers.

He needs to go for it. Hit them with multiple XOs taking on the issue from different angles. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.


33 posted on 10/30/2018 5:48:09 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3701141/posts


34 posted on 10/30/2018 5:49:17 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Kill-googl,TWITR,FACBK,NYT,WaPo,Hlywd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antifa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

Regardless of whether he can do it (and with this court I think he can) I wish that people would call the thing he is ending “birthright citizenship without residency” because just saying “birthright citizenry” sounds alarming and is inaccurate. This is about the lack of residency. It would be sort of like a pregnant person breaking into your house, giving birth, and then claiming that she and the kid now live there and should be on the deed.


35 posted on 10/30/2018 5:49:43 AM PDT by BlackAdderess (VOTE!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

All it takes is one group to demand a ruling be put aside because Ginsburg was asleep during the hearing.


36 posted on 10/30/2018 5:49:54 AM PDT by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Let the Supremes decide

9-0 the Constitution requires birthright citizenship and an Amendment would be required to end it.

Are you SURE this is a case you want them to hear?

37 posted on 10/30/2018 5:51:53 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

Not sure he has the authority, but this should have been law long ago


38 posted on 10/30/2018 5:53:38 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry

I believe illegals are subject to US jurisdiction. It will be hard to close this loophole. It was too broad.


39 posted on 10/30/2018 5:54:27 AM PDT by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SleeperCatcher

The Civil War amendments were created to Centralize power in DC so that slavery and discrimination could be outlawed. It’s time to repeal them because they are now used by the left in ways far beyond the intent. They have effectively erased the 9th and 10th admendments with this centalization of power.


40 posted on 10/30/2018 5:55:14 AM PDT by Nateman (If the left is not screaming, you are doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson