Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

British princesses have babies. Why not American paupers?
1 posted on 11/01/2018 1:36:16 AM PDT by kathsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kathsua
The ability to make new human beings makes women the superior sex.

Really?

More misandry in our culture.

2 posted on 11/01/2018 1:59:00 AM PDT by sauropod (Yield to sin, and experience chastening and sorrow; yield to God, and experience joy and blessing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
NOT MY WIFE !!!

Twins- no big deal. <—That’s a quote.
+1 a few years later. <— What was that ? Another quote.

She’s a wonderful Farm Girl😄

Ya don’t piss Mama off... but once.

3 posted on 11/01/2018 2:14:52 AM PDT by mabarker1 (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

In gender segregated schools women did not have to rely on the bad boy of the classroom to stand up to the teacher and develop a domination order. Women had to fend for themselves in the jungle and rough up authority on their own.

The eesultis women back then were much stronger headed and natural leaders. Nowadays they are pathetic.


4 posted on 11/01/2018 2:26:45 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
Just and anecdotal comment: after I graduated from USAF pilot training, I went to land and arctic survival training, and there were women in my class. With the exception of one or two, they were incredible in the field. They quickly learned, as we all did, how to make fires in many situations, how to find food sources, how to build shelters, etc. If you have ever watched one of those survival reality shows, sometimes it is the female partner who is much better.

Throughout human history, women have exhibited incredible fortitude towards basic survival, for both themselves, and their families.

Today's radicals at college campuses, the feminists, and the SJWs are useless, but that's on them.

6 posted on 11/01/2018 3:19:30 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

they are not weaker- just different priorities.


8 posted on 11/01/2018 3:41:32 AM PDT by ronniesgal (I wonder what his FR handle is?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Physically I would say no, emotionally I would say yes.


9 posted on 11/01/2018 4:37:15 AM PDT by TexasM1A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

I’d say we’re all weaker; not just women.

Take a drive down any Texas road in July and think about the wagon trains heading westward in the 100+ degree heat. Or crossing the mountains in the middle of winter in the area of your favorite ski resort.

How many of us today could do that?

Physically weaker - mostly yes. Emotionally weaker - definitely yes. Spiritually weaker - indubitably.


10 posted on 11/01/2018 5:05:07 AM PDT by Larry - Moe and Curly (Loose lips sink ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Having and raising babies is nothing compared to the rewards gained from sitting in a cubicle and clicking on spreadsheets. Careers are exciting!! There are several television shows that prove it.


11 posted on 11/01/2018 5:41:51 AM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Everyone is weaker than people were 50 years ago.


12 posted on 11/01/2018 5:42:53 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Vote your bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

In all fairness, babies today are a lot bigger than they were even fifty years ago. Average birth weights:

1930-1949: 7.4lbs
1950-1969: 7.3lbs
1970-1989: 7.7lbs
1990-2008: 7.8lbs

Keep in mind that these are average weights. They are dragged lower by premature babies, that today have a much higher survival rate than they used to. So larger babies today are much more common, though women’s equipment to deliver them has remained the same size.


14 posted on 11/01/2018 7:46:37 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Liberals have become moralistic, dogmatic, sententious, self-righteous, pinch-faced prudes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Not an argument in favor of abortion, but it may well be that women in general are weaker than 50 years ago.


15 posted on 11/01/2018 8:02:44 AM PDT by Salman (Democrats. The other "religion of peace".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Men sprint, women marathon. One’s built to do or die, the other to endure, whether he do or die.

But as to the writer’s premise, I always wonder how well I’d have endured if I’d lived during the Ice Age. Or most any woman I know. Ok, I know a few female stable hands who are quite rugged. And then there are Russian women.


18 posted on 11/01/2018 9:33:25 AM PDT by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson