Posted on 11/22/2018 3:52:27 PM PST by deandg99
Investigative journalist Laura Loomer has been permanently suspended from Twitter, she confirmed in a conversation Wednesday evening with Big League Politics.
Loomer had more than 200,000 followers on the platform, making her a force to be reckoned with in a medium populated by dullard NPCs with blue check marks next to their names.
Loomer said that she was banned for a tweet she wrote criticizing Sharia law for oppressing women and men around the world.
(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...
Telling the truth about Islam is not permitted.
Twitter must always protects muslims so they can continue to subjugate and abuse their women, ya know?
Telling the truth about Islam is considered hate speech to the liberal douchebags at Twitter.
Use the Acosta strategy: sue as your constitutional right has been violated. See where that takes you.
According to her Gab account; she has been banned from Twitter and Facebook or should I call them by their real names; Twatter and Fecesbook?
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize. attributed to Voltaire
Telling the truth about Islam is not permitted.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Its already a crime in england.
Coming soon to USA if they have their way
Yet twitter doesn’t ban Farrakhan, who called Jews termites and said that he respected Adolf Hitler, that’s all good in twitterland
Did they fillow ‘due process’? She should sue
You may be on to something there, but it goes back further than the Acosta incident.
Remember when a judge "ordered" President Trump to unblock users from his Twitter account? Since the account preceded Trump becoming President, it then applies to NON PUBLIC accounts such as Loomer.
What is the difference between Trump and Loomer? Nothing that i can think of. There exists an equal protection under law clause of the US Constitution. If judges are going to intervene against Trump, they should intervene FOR Loomer.
Who is he, I don't recall him posting here.......
Twitter=Facebook=Google=Youtube=Are they just collecting and selling people’s data and peddling advertising or actually providing a useful secure service?
>> Twitter=Facebook=Google=Youtube=Are they just collecting and selling peoples data ...
I the service is “free”, it’s YOU that is the product.
The left is all about censorship and power and control. I dont see any way for Trump to break up Twitter or Facebook. Trump does need to look into a platform for true open unfettered dialogue.
Voltaire is probably banned on fakebook and Twitter too.
A retroactive ban.
5.56mm
Michelle Malkin created two successful websites and made millions without the gatekeepers from Silicon Valley.
And for you mean-old right-wing FReepers who compare what Twitter and Facebook is doing to the electric or phone companies: There is NO comparison. FR itself is immune from these tactics because the legendary Head FReeper JimRob implemented a vision that he would not be controlled by the very leftists that are shadow-banning or outright suspending conservatives.
IT CAN BE DONE. Start your own service and COMPETE
There’s a whole astroturf industry where paid monitors do nothing but check every post by conservatives, and flag them for any excuse. Paid. Hundreds lf people, all day, every day. Media matters is one group. There are many.
Look people, either you can drop all this “muh privut cumpunee” nonsense and support trustbusting and regulating social media to enforce the 1st amendment on it, or you can lose your free speech by quasi-government Big Tech proxy.
Your choice.
How does permanently suspended differ from banned?
Laura is bulldog demanding answers. Good girl that does not trifle fools and rogues.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.